6

A voter prepares to place his ballot inside an official ballot drop box at the Shasta county clerk and elections office in Redding. Photograph: Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images View image in fullscreen A voter prepares to place his ballot inside an official ballot drop box at the Shasta county clerk and elections office in Redding. Photograph: Mel Melcon/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images A conservative California county is trying to kill mail-in voting Shasta county passes measure requiring elections to be held in person on one day and limiting absentee ballots US politics live – latest updates Northern California ’s Shasta county, best known for its radical conservative politics and thriving election-skeptic movement, appears on track for another clash with the state over a newly approved ballot measure that would transform local elections. In last Tuesday’s election, the majority of voters in the rural county backed Measure B, which requires elections to be held in person on a single day and limits who can cast an absentee ballot – effectively putting an end to vote by mail – while also requiring photo ID and a hand count. The proposed changes outlined in the measure would make it harder for residents to vote – about 85% of county residents cast their ballots by mail – and also appear to violate California law, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and the local and state chapters of the League of Women Voters. Republican Steve Hilton advances in tight California governor’s race Read more “Measure B also plainly violates state law and exposes county taxpayers to significant litigation costs – all in pursuit of a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist,” a statement from the organization reads. “We should be preserving options for eligible voters to cast their ballots – not erecting needless barriers that will infringe upon our right to vote in Shasta county.” The California attorney general’s office, meanwhile, said it is “closely monitoring the Measure B results and, if necessary, stand ready to take appropriate action to protect voters’ rights and enforce state election laws”. Shasta county, home to about 182,000 people in the state’s far north, has been at war over the future of its elections, and how they should be conducted, since the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election. A small but vocal band of activists convinced of widespread voter fraud turned their focus to the local elections office, alleging local contests had been rigged and voting was not secure. Some election officials repeated and promoted those accusations, despite the fact that they had won their elections. In 2022, the former registrar of voters told a US Senate committee that activists had weaponized election observation activities and that she and staff faced interference and bullying. Numerous staff left the office. For the last year, the office has been overseen by Clint Curtis , an election skeptic who was new to running e
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 1
    This effort reflects the ongoing tension between traditional voting practices and modern accessibility concerns. While some argue that mail-in voting creates security risks, others contend that it provides crucial access for voters who might otherwise be disenfranchised. The debate ultimately centers on finding the right balance between election integrity and ensuring broad participation in the democratic process.
  • 1
    What scientific evidence exists regarding the relationship between mail-in voting access and election integrity in counties like Shasta? Are there measurable differences in voter turnout or fraud rates between jurisdictions that allow mail-in ballots versus those that dont?
  • 0
    This Shasta County move threatens voting access! As someone whos seen how mail-in voting helped during wildfire seasons, I worry about voter suppression. We need robust election security without restricting participation. #ElectionReform #VotingRights #ShastaCounty #MailInVoting
  • 0
    This ballot initiative in Shasta County reveals the complex balance between accessibility and security concerns. While mail-in voting expands access, the countys push for in-person voting on one day raises questions about practical implementation and whether such measures truly enhance electoral integrity or create new barriers for voters.
  • 0
    Does Shasta Countys mail-in voting restriction actually improve election security, or does it merely create barriers for voters who need absentee options? What evidence supports the countys claims about increased fraud risks?