5

Doctors monitor a patient at an Ebola treatment centre run by Médecins Sans Frontières in Munigi, eastern DRC. Photograph: Jospin Mwisha/AFP/Getty Images View image in fullscreen Doctors monitor a patient at an Ebola treatment centre run by Médecins Sans Frontières in Munigi, eastern DRC. Photograph: Jospin Mwisha/AFP/Getty Images DRC Ebola outbreak could have begun as early as January, WHO chief says Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus says the virus ‘had a big head start’ but that the response was catching up The Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo could have begun as early as January, the head of the World Health Organization said, giving the virus “a big head start”. Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also said the response was being hindered by blanket travel restrictions and highlighted high levels of community mistrust and low levels of contact tracing as key concerns. Since the outbreak was identified in mid-May, the Bundibugyo virus has caused 344 confirmed Ebola cases including 60 deaths in DRC, and 15 confirmed cases including one death in neighbouring Uganda. “The outbreak had a big head start, and we’re still behind” but the response was catching up, Tedros said, with treatment centres now established across Ituri province, the most affected part of DRC. He called on countries that have imposed blanket travel restrictions, such as the US, to lift them. They “are disrupting supply chains and hindering the response”, he said. Contact tracing, a key element of the response to any infectious disease outbreak, is being made particularly difficult by insecurity and displacement in Ituri, he said, with only about 45% of contacts followed up. “To get ahead of the outbreak we need to get that number up to above 90%,” he said. The number of suspected cases in DRC fell abruptly on Tuesday from more than 1,000 to 116, as officials worked through a testing backlog to either confirm them or rule them out. Burials and tears as Ebola outbreak continues to spread in DRC – in pictures Read more Tedros said it was a key priority to scale up laboratory and diagnostic capacity in the most affected areas as well as neighbouring provinces and countries. The first identified case in the outbreak was a nurse who went to a health centre on 24 April, but Tedros said there were alternative scenarios. “It could be January, it could be February, March, April,” he said. “But I think the focus now should be on the response.” Mistrust was a serious barrier, he said, with some community leaders telling him during a visit to DRC last week that they did not believe Ebola was real. He said they also worried that the response would take resources away from other vital services. There is currently no vaccine or treatment for the Bundibugyo strain of the virus, but Tedros said the recovery of six people in DRC and two in Uganda showed that people could survive Ebola if they had access to care and went to health facilities as soon as they showed symptoms. The UK’s Fore
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 1
    Wow, its amazing that the WHO is finally acknowledging the truth - the Ebola outbreak in DRC began in January, like a week before the rest of the world caught on. What a brilliant piece of detective work by the international community!
  • 2
    Its concerning that the Ebola outbreak in DRC started months earlier than initially reported. Could this delayed acknowledgment impact global preparedness and response strategies?
  • 0
    Can the delayed acknowledgment actually help us learn from this, improve response times, and save lives in future outbreaks? Lets hope so, because every day counts in the battle against infectious diseases.
  • 0
    While its impressive that the WHO is recognizing the earlier outbreak, its crucial to understand the complexities of epidemic response. The delay in acknowledgment may have been due to various factors, including improved surveillance systems and more accurate diagnostic tools. Its a positive step towards transparency and better global health security.
  • 0
    While delayed acknowledgment might seem counterintuitive, it could be crucial for improving response times and saving lives in future outbreaks. Each day lost can have severe consequences. Lets hope this learning process helps us be better prepared. #EbolaResponse #PublicHealth #GlobalHealth
  • 0
    Efficient response is key in any crisis, but transparency is equally vital. Delayed acknowledgment can lead to misinformation and missed opportunities. Lets focus on learning from past mistakes and improving our preparedness.