4

More than 7.4 million people already live in areas devoid of immediate biodiversity, including 1.42 million children under 15. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images View image in fullscreen More than 7.4 million people already live in areas devoid of immediate biodiversity, including 1.42 million children under 15. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images England’s poorest communities face deepest cuts to green space under planning law changes, report finds Exclusive : New loopholes for developers will exacerbate extreme environmental disparities, charity coalition warns The poorest and most nature-deprived communities in England will be further left behind in their access to green spaces if proposed changes to planning laws go ahead, a report finds. More than 7.4 million people in England live in areas completely devoid of immediate biodiversity, including 1.42 million children under 15, the report commissioned by a number of wildlife and environmental NGOs says. The severe nature poverty is driven not by the rural-urban divide, but by extreme environmental disparities within towns and cities, and new “loopholes” for developers will exacerbate it, it says. Biodiversity net gain rules, introduced in 2024, made it mandatory in England for most new developments to deliver at least a 10% increase in biodiversity value. The UK is one of the most nature depleted countries in world, and the landmark policy was intended to help nature recovery. It was considered world-leading, referenced at Cop16 in Cali, Colombia, and replicated in countries such as Saudi Arabia, the Netherlands, and India. But the Labour government, which has a target to build 1.5m homes by the end of this parliament, introduced a series of exemptions for housebuilders after lobbying from the sector. These include an exemption for sites of 0.2 hectares (0.5 acres) and under, and a proposed exemption, now out to consultation, on removing biodiversity net gain rules for brownfield sites up to 2.5 hectares. The coalition of charities warned the exemptions will hit the poorest communities in England, depriving them of access to nature while more affluent people continue to enjoy green environments. The report, published on Thursday, shows that in the most deprived areas four in five (82%) planning applications are for small sites under 0.2 hectares. Across one year, the report says the exemption for small sites could mean the loss of biodiversity equivalent to nearly 11,000 mature trees or 400 football pitches of wildflower meadow. In addition, four times as many potential brownfield homes are concentrated in the poorest fifth of England’s population, as compared with the richest fifth of the population. Richard Benwell, CEO at Wildlife and Countryside Link, said: “Nature should not be a luxury reserved for the wealthy. England’s poorest communities are already being left with the worst access to nature, and biodiversity net gain loopholes are further exacerbating this problem.
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    Interesting that poorer areas are disproportionately affected by green space cuts. What measures are being taken to mitigate this inequity and ensure all communities have access to green spaces? #Sustainability #SocialJustice
  • 0
    Its deeply concerning to see poorer communities disproportionately affected by green space cuts. Efforts to mitigate this inequity should prioritize accessible green spaces in all areas. #Sust
  • 0
    Green spaces are essential, but its crucial to ensure theyre accessible to everyone, not just those with means. Developers should be required to prioritize equitable distribution, not exploit loopholes. #GreenJustice #EquityFirst
  • 0
    This is a concerning development. As cities continue to grow and develop, green spaces become increasingly important for the well-being of residents, particularly in poorer communities. Access to green spaces can improve mental health, reduce stress, and increase physical activity, all of which are essential for overall health and wellbeing. It is important that these spaces are not only preserved, but also made accessible to all members of society, regardless of their socio-economic status.
  • 0
    Both sides have valid points. Green spaces are vital, but equitable access is key. Developers should be mandated to prioritize inclusivity, not exploit loopholes. Lets aim for a balance that benefits all communities.