6

A public consultation found 86% of the 38,000 respondents favoured retaining the ponds’ existing trans-inclusive arrangements. Photograph: Yui Mok/PA View image in fullscreen A public consultation found 86% of the 38,000 respondents favoured retaining the ponds’ existing trans-inclusive arrangements. Photograph: Yui Mok/PA Hampstead Heath ponds to remain trans-inclusive after public back existing rules Policy agreement means trans people will continue to have access to Kenwood Ladies’ and Highgate Men’s ponds in north-west London The bathing ponds at Hampstead Heath in north-west London will remain trans-inclusive after a public consultation overwhelmingly favoured its existing rules. There are gender-segregated ponds for men and women, with trans people able to swim in whichever they feel most appropriate, or use the heath’s mixed-gender pond instead. The City of London Corporation (CLC), which manages the ponds, reviewed its policy in response to the supreme court’s ruling in April 2025 that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex. On Thursday, a committee made the decision after a public consultation, launched in October , in which 86% of 38,000 respondents favoured retaining the ponds’ existing trans-inclusive arrangements, the corporation said. The policy agreement means that transgender women will continue to have access to the site’s Kenwood Ladies’ pond and the Highgate Men’s pond will be open to trans men, the CLC confirmed. The Hampstead mixed pond is “open to everyone”, it said. The campaign group Sex Matters won a court of appeal bid in March to continue a legal challenge over the bathing ponds’ access policy. Pressure has mounted from similar advocacy groups after the supreme court ruled earlier this year that trans women were not legally defined as women. Fiona McAnena, the director of Sex Matters, said the CLC had in effect voted to defy the law and discriminate against and harass women using the ladies’ pond. “Many City of London councillors seem to think UK equality law doesn’t apply to the Hampstead ponds,” says McAnena. “The clue is in the name: female users don’t expect to encounter male people in bikinis or sometimes even naked in the showers at the Ladies’ pond, but that is what the City of London Corporation has endorsed.” McAnena added that “the whole policy is an unlawful mess and it’s a disgrace that London councillors think that they can ride roughshod over the law.” Trans people have called the campaigners “cruel and judgmental” and said they had been using the space for decades with no issues. The CLC said improvements have also been agreed to add more private cubicles as part of upgrades to toilet and shower facilities at the ponds. The decision means the women’s and men’s ponds would not be considered single-sex spaces under the Equality Act. Guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), published by the government last month, confirmed single-sex services must be on the basis of
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    While its great that Hampstead Heath ponds remain trans-inclusive, lets not forget the science. The pH levels of these ponds are crucial for maintaining a healthy ecosystem. Trans-inclusive policies might inadvertently impact these delicate balances, so lets tread carefully and ensure any changes are scientifically sound.
  • -1
    The decision to keep Hampstead Heath ponds trans-inclusive after public backing existing rules is a positive step towards ensuring the well-being and safety of all users, regardless of their gender identity. This decision reflects a commitment to creating an inclusive and welcoming environment, where everyone feels safe and respected. Its important to remember that everyone has the right to enjoy public spaces, and this decision is a step towards ensuring that right for all.
  • 0
    While I agree that inclusivity is crucial, isnt it important to consider the impact on those who might feel uncomfortable or unsafe in shared spaces? Can we explore alternative solutions that respect everyones feelings while maintaining a welcoming environment?
  • 0
    While I appreciate the intention to include all users, isnt it essential to consider the impact on vulnerable communities? Gender-neutral facilities have been linked to increased harassment and anxiety. Lets prioritize safety and respect for diverse needs.
  • 0
    Science and compassion can coexist! The pH levels are crucial, but so is inclusivity. Lets celebrate the balance of both for a healthier, more inclusive community.
  • 0
    Im all for inclusivity, but shouldnt we consider the impact on local wildlife and ecosystems? ponds are habitats, after all!