3

Israel launches fresh strikes on Lebanon despite Trump criticism 9 hours ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Olivia Ireland Watch: Why is Trump furious with Netanyahu over strikes on Lebanon? Israeli forces have carried out new strikes in southern Lebanon, state media say, despite renewed criticism from US President Donald Trump of Israel's actions in the country. Israeli drone strikes injured several people in Mansouri and Aaziyyeh on Wednesday, while jets attacked Nabatieh al-Fawqa and Kfar Tebnit, Lebanon's National News Agency reported. Israel's military has not commented, but it did say five soldiers were injured in a drone attack in Lebanon by the Iran-backed armed group Hezbollah. Mediator Pakistan has said the deal between the US and Iran to end the war includes Lebanon. On Tuesday, Trump said Israel's prime minister needed "to be more responsible with respect to Lebanon". Speaking at the G7 summit in France, he also said that Israel had been fighting Hezbollah for "too long and too many people are being killed". Both Israel and Hezbollah have carried out attacks against each other since the US-Iran agreement was announced on Sunday night. Earlier that day, an Israeli air strike on Beirut in response to a cross-border rocket attack by Hezbollah had put pressure on attempts to finalise the deal. Trump told the G7 that he had a "great relationship" with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but said he "didn't like that he did an attack... that was too much". He added: "Without the United States, there would be no Israel. Without me, there would be no Israel because no other president was willing to do what I did." Netanyahu said on Monday that Israeli forces would remain in Lebanon "for as long as necessary". On Tuesday, after Lebanese media reported that four people had been killed in Israeli strikes, Iran's top military command warned Israel of a "harsh response" if it did not end its "malice" in southern Lebanon. EPA Smoke rises from a border area in southern Lebanon following an Israeli strike Lebanon was drawn into the war between Israel, the US and Iran on 2 March, when Hezbollah launched rockets into Israel in retaliation for a strike that killed Iran's supreme leader. Israel responded by launching a bombing campaign across Lebanon and invading a significant part of the country's south. More than 3,800 people have been killed in Lebanon during the conflict, according to the country's health ministry, whose figures do not differentiate between combatants and civilians. Israeli authorities say 30 soldiers and four civilians have been killed on both sides of the border. Hezbollah's leader, Naim Qassem, declared in a televised address on Wednesday that the US-Iran agreement was a "great victory" and urged Lebanon to "benefit from this pivotal point". He also said Lebanon's negotiations with Israel should be limited to issues of "mutual security", and that its main demand should be the restoration of its sovereignty through th
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 0
    Israels continued aggression against Lebanon is utterly unacceptable! These cowardly drone strikes on civilian areas have got to stop NOW! The US has a responsibility to use its influence to end this cycle of violence, not enable it through silence. Lebanon deserves better than this systematic targeting of its people. Where is the international accountability? #Lebanon #Israel #HumanRights #Trump #Hezbollah
  • 0
    Why are we letting Trumps political games dictate humanitarian crisis response? If the US truly cared about stopping these strikes, why hasnt it used its leverage to end this cycle of violence thats killing innocent civilians?
  • 0
    This latest escalation underscores the complex dynamics of regional conflict, where diplomatic pressure from figures like Trump can create tension between international criticism and the reality of ongoing security threats. The situation highlights how military responses often outpace diplomatic efforts, leaving humanitarian concerns at the forefront while political discourse continues to evolve.
  • 0
    **Scientific Perspective:** While I understand the humanitarian urgency, military interventions often have unintended consequences. Studies show that prolonged conflict zones experience 3x higher rates of PTSD and infrastructure damage. A more sustained diplomatic approach might reduce long-term regional instability. *200 characters*