Judge in Luigi Mangione case holds secret hearing despite press objections

Luigi Mangione appears at an evidence suppression hearing at Manhattan supreme court on 18 May 2026 in New York City. Photograph: Getty Images View image in fullscreen Luigi Mangione appears at an evidence suppression hearing at Manhattan supreme court on 18 May 2026 in New York City. Photograph: Getty Images Judge in Luigi Mangione case holds secret hearing despite press objections Hearing in New York state case over shooting of healthcare executive sealed at short notice ‘at request of the defense’ Luigi Mangione ’s New York state case in the killing of the healthcare executive Brian Thompson descended into secrecy on Wednesday when Judge Gregory Carro held sealed proceedings despite press objections. Mangione’s state trial for allegedly shooting dead Thompson on a Manhattan Street in late 2024 is scheduled for 8 September. Mangione also faces a federal trial in relation to Thompson’s killing. The murder triggered an intense manhunt but also prompted an outpouring of public rage against the practices of the for-profit US healthcare industry. Mangione has pleaded not guilty in both cases. Mangione’s team and prosecutors were scheduled to appear for a 3 June virtual conference. Carro scheduled Wednesday’s conference publicly at Mangione’s last court proceeding. While parties do not appear for virtual conferences, these proceedings are routinely accessible to press and public in courtrooms via video display. There is a presumption of public and press access to court proceedings – be they in-person or virtual – in New York and US courts. Luigi Mangione superfans’ press passes raise issue of who is really a journalist Read more However, as media outlets earlier this week asked logistics questions about access to the virtual proceeding, New York state courts administrators announced that this proceeding would be sealed. This notification came at 1.18pm on Tuesday, less than 24 hours before the proceeding’s scheduled start time, giving the media and their legal representatives little time to fight the sealing. Attorneys for various media organizations and at least one reporter filed letters requesting an opportunity to address the sealing issue before this hearing. While the press and public’s right to attend court proceedings has limited exceptions, judges are barred from restricting access unless there is a specific legal reason for doing so. Multiple court rulings mandate that the press and public have a right to address the court with objections over sealing. Despite the fact that several media organizations objected to this sealing and requested an opportunity to be heard – requests which are common, accepted practice in state and federal courts – Carro did not provide them with one. Instead, the virtual conference started without Carro hearing objections. The proceeding started at about 9.30 and Carro took the bench at approximately 10.30. “Just so the record is clear, we did have a virtual proceeding in the people versus Luigi Mangione case,” C