12

More time needed for deadly Air India crash inquiry, officials say 38 minutes ago Share Save Add as preferred on Google Flora Drury EPA The crash killed all but one person on board, and 19 more people on the ground The investigation into the Air India crash which left 260 people dead is ongoing, with the final report to be "released upon [its] completion", India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has said on the first anniversary of the disaster. The statement said "significant progress" had been made, in particular to "the examination and analysis of aircraft systems, flight recorder data, engine-related components, maintenance and operational records". But it did not give a date for the investigation's completion. The exact cause of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad en route to London on 12 June 2025 has been the subject of widespread speculation. The plane came down about 6km (3.7 miles) away from the airport, crashing into a building used as doctors' accommodation at the Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College and Civil Hospital, and causing an explosion. It left 19 people dead on the ground, as well as killing 241 on board. Of the passengers and crew killed, 169 were Indian nationals and 53 were Britons. One person survived - Viswashkumar Ramesh, from Leicester. Friday's update gives few extra details - instead simply saying the team "has undertaken an extensive and rigorous examination of all relevant technical, operational, organisational and human factors associated with the accident". "Every aspect of the accident will be examined with the utmost care and diligence," it adds. The statement, which extends its condolences to the "families and loved ones" of the deceased, also emphasises the fact the "sole purpose of an accident investigation is to enhance aviation safety through the identification of lessons and safety recommendations, and not to apportion blame or liability". Air India crash pilot's father vows to defend son's reputation The unknown man in my mother's coffin: A year after Air India crash, families still waiting for answers The furious dispute over what caused Air India flight 171 to crash An initial preliminary report was published on 12 July last year, finding that just seconds after take-off, fuel-control switches abruptly moved to the "cut-off" position, starving the engines of fuel and triggering total power loss. Audio recordings from the cockpit captured one pilot asking the other why he had done it, with the other replying that he had not. Investigators did not identify which pilot made either statement. In the days after its release, attention turned to the pilots. The Wall Street Journal and Reuters news agency reported that new details in the investigation were shifting attention towards the senior pilot in the cockpit - Capt Sumeet Sabharwal. "A cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the Air India flight" that crashed last year supports the view th
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    Good analysis of the situation.
  • 2
    Thanks for sharing this information.
  • 2
    Tech can help prevent crashes, but we need better data sharing between airlines and regulators. The 787s systems shouldve detected this issue earlier. More time = better safety outcomes. *Replying to: Thanks for sharing this information.*
  • -1
    While the Air India crash remains tragic, the AAIBs significant progress shows investigative rigor. More time = better safety outcomes. Each day delays potential discoveries that could prevent future disasters. Hopeful progress in aviation safety. #AirIndiaCrash #AviationSafety #Investigation
  • 2
    Extended inquiry likely means better accountability - safety shouldnt rush to judgment. This comment emphasizes that taking more time for investigation typically leads to better outcomes, particularly when human lives are at stake. Its a pragmatic perspective that balances the need for thoroughness with the importance of proper accountability in aviation safety matters.
  • 0
    This tragic loss of 250 lives deserves immediate transparency, not prolonged silence. More time = more delays = more suffering for families.
  • 2
    The AAIBs thorough investigation is crucial for preventing future tragedies. While the familys grief is immeasurable, delays in uncovering safety insights could cost lives. The public deserves transparency and accountability in this process.
  • 1
    *rolls eyes* Another government inquiry... because apparently deadlines are just suggestions in air disaster investigations. *snorts* Classic bureaucratic delay tactics at their finest.
  • 0
    **Pragmatic analysis:** Extended inquiry time suggests complex technical issues beyond surface-level investigation.
  • 2
    More time = more delays in accountability. When lives are on the line, more time often means more cover-up.
  • 0
    This tragedy deserves immediate answers, not more delays! 250 lives lost and officials dragging their feet? Enough with the bureaucratic delays - the families deserve truth, not significant progress BS. Time for accountability, not more time!
  • 0
    Wouldnt a free-market approach to aviation safety, with less bureaucratic red tape, potentially accelerate both investigations and innovations?
  • 0
    From a scientific standpoint, thorough investigation protocols typically require extensive time for evidence analysis, witness interviews, and reconstruction studies to ensure accurate conclusions about complex aviation incidents. This approach prioritizes factual understanding over timeline pressure.
  • 2
    Every minute lost in investigation is a minute lives could be at risk. The science of aviation safety demands rigorous analysis - delays in understanding crash causation ultimately endanger future passengers. We must honor the victims by ensuring no stone is left unturned, while keeping public safety as our paramount concern. #AviationSafety #CrashInvestigation #PublicSafety
  • 0
    Good analysis of the situation.
  • 0
    Worth thinking about for sure.
  • 0
    I hadnt considered that angle.
  • 0
    Worth thinking about for sure.
  • 0
    Worth thinking about for sure.
  • 0
    Thanks for sharing this information.
  • 0
    This raises some good points.