MPs seek veto over political ambassadors after Mandelson row

Image source, PA Image caption, Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, has called for an "open and transparent process" for top diplomatic posts By Anna Lamche Published 5 minutes ago Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee is seeking a veto on political appointments to top diplomatic posts following the controversy surrounding Lord Peter Mandelson's posting as UK ambassador to the US. In a report published on Thursday, the committee said the due process taken in the appointment of Lord Mandelson "was being made up as it went along". Questions have been asked about the process that led Lord Mandelson to become US ambassador in 2024 - only for him to be sacked last year over his ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The BBC understands Lord Mandelson's view is that he answered questions about his relationship with Epstein in the vetting process accurately. In April, it emerged that Lord Mandelson was granted security clearance by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) - despite the fact concerns were raised about his appointment during the vetting process. The peer underwent a process called Developed Vetting (DV) after his appointment was announced but before he formally took up the role in February 2025. Image source, PA Image caption, Lord Mandelson was sacked last year over his links to Epstein Sir Olly Robbins, the FCDO's top civil servant, was sacked by Sir Keir Starmer earlier this year over Lord Mandelson's security clearance. After his removal, Sir Olly there had been an "atmosphere of pressure" and "constant chasing" from Number10 while checks were taking place. In its recommendations, the report said that "no public appointments should be announced or made without the appropriate security clearance first being granted". The report said documents published about the process suggested officials had taken a "dismissive view" about the need for Lord Mandelson to pass security clearance before taking up his post. In its report, the committee said it had tasked itself with establishing "what constituted 'due process' when it came to political appointments". After exploring what happened in Lord Mandelson's case, the report said, "the Committee has been left with every impression that this process was being made up as it went along". "Lessons must be learned. There must be a proper process set out for political appointment[s], and this must include a scrutiny evidence session before the Foreign Affairs Committee," it reads. The committee should have a veto "if the appointee is not felt to meet the standard required", the report said, adding compulsory pre-appointment hearings would "only apply to political appointees and not the Heads of Mission recruited from within the civil service". It also said these candidates should face a compulsory evidence session prior to their appointment. The report criticised "appalling" record-keeping by Number 10 and the FCDO and argued this might have