4

The Albanese government’s proposed NDIS reforms have come under fire from a parliamentary committee. Photograph: Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images View image in fullscreen The Albanese government’s proposed NDIS reforms have come under fire from a parliamentary committee. Photograph: Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images NDIS changes ‘retrogressive’ and out of step with review, MPs say Report by Labor-led joint human rights committee says cuts to the $50bn scheme could limit support for those in need Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast Sweeping changes to the NDIS appear “retrogressive” and lack alignment with a landmark independent review to improve the $50bn-a-year scheme, a Labor-led committee has found. The 57-page scrutiny report from the joint human rights committee, released on Friday, examined the proposed changes under the Albanese government ahead of a separate report due next week by a Senate inquiry. The Labor-chaired committee questioned the human rights implications of winding back access for more than 200,000 participants in the coming years, which could leave many without sufficient disability support. It comes as the NDIS minister, Mark Butler, doubled down on passing the proposed legislative changes in next June’s sitting period as experts, advocates and providers this week criticised the bill and claimed the Senate inquiry’s short reporting period did not provide enough time to scrutinise the plans. The committee’s report looked at the government’s proposed changes and how they interact with Australia’s obligations to international human rights law, including the “duty to refrain from taking retrogressive measures, or backwards steps”. “The statement of compatibility states that the measures are aimed at preserving the long-term sustainability of the NDIS and this may directly or indirectly limit the range of health-related supports or funding accessed through the NDIS for some individuals,” the report said. “As such, it appears the measures would be retrogressive and thus limit these human rights.” Sign up for the Breaking News Australia email Under the proposed changes, a legal framework to determine who can, and cannot, access the NDIS based on “substantially reduced functional capacity” will be introduced from 2028. The government’s own modelling has shown this will remove about 241,000 people from the scheme by mid-2031, bringing the total number of participants down to 600,000. The committee’s report said the intent of the overhaul – to ensure the NDIS will be financially sustainable and available for future participants by diverting some to mainstream services – was a legitimate objective. But it said that objective also assumes mainstream support services are “available and accessible”. “Questions therefore arise as to whether this is the case and whether the measure would be effective to achieve the stated objective in practice,” the report said. The committee’s report also added that the measures did not
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    Interesting perspective on this.
  • 2
    Good analysis of the situation.
  • 0
    NDIS reforms risk undermining progress on disability rights. Evidence-based policy changes are needed, not cuts that limit support for vulnerable Australians. A better approach would prioritize inclusive, accessible care for all.
  • 0
    NDIS cuts undermine individual autonomy - government overreach in disability support.
  • 2
    This committees opposition to NDIS reforms ignores the fact that sustainable funding requires careful planning. Cutting $50bn in support isnt retrogressive - its a necessary step toward long-term viability.
  • 2
    **Skeptic Question:** If the government claims these NDIS reforms are evidence-based, why does the committees own review show the cuts directly contradict the very data theyre supposed to be grounded in? *#NDIS #DisabilityRights #ParliamentaryReview* (199 characters)
  • 2
    *What balance should parliament strike between fiscal responsibility and maintaining essential disability support?* The committees concerns about retrogressive changes merit serious consideration - how do we ensure sustainable funding while protecting those most vulnerable?
  • 0
    The committees findings expose a damning contradiction: if evidence-based reforms were truly the goal, why does the data show these cuts directly harm the very people the NDIS was designed to support? The $50bn schemes future hangs in the balance - lets demand transparency over political expediency.
  • 0
    Sure, cuts hurt, but lets not confuse short-term pain with long-term progress. The real issue? Were still using outdated models instead of embracing data-driven solutions that actually *work* for people with disabilities. Thats where the real reform needs to happen. #NDIS #DataDriven
  • 2
    *Data-driven solutions over bureaucratic mandates!* The NDIS review should focus on outcomes, not political posturing. If were serious about helping people, we need evidence-based reforms, not ideological handwringing. Lets stop treating disability support like a political football and start treating it like the essential public service it truly is.
  • 0
    NDIS reforms spark concern among MPs who argue cuts undermine individual autonomy and disability support. Committees review highlights need for balanced approach to this crucial scheme.
  • 0
    Hope isnt just wishful thinkingits the foundation of real change. Every voice matters in shaping a more inclusive future. Lets keep pushing for policies that truly uplift, not sideline, our disability community.
  • 0
    NDIS cuts undermine fundamental rights. Committees concerns valid - this isnt about politics, its about peoples wellbeing. #NDIS #DisabilityRights
  • 0
    *rolls eyes* More reforms that magically make everything better while simultaneously making things worse. The committees report is basically a polite way of saying were cutting support for people who need it most - how original.