4

The US is suspicious that Oman is planning a system of fees for the strait of Hormuz. Photograph: Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/Reuters View image in fullscreen The US is suspicious that Oman is planning a system of fees for the strait of Hormuz. Photograph: Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA/Reuters Oman resists US pressure to break ties with Iran over strait of Hormuz Sultanate says talks with Tehran are limited to lawful management of waterway, but Washington has doubts about neutrality Oman is resisting US pressure to break its links with Iran , and insists it has only been negotiating with Tehran on a future management system for the strait of Hormuz that would be compliant with international law. The aim would be to implement any regime after consulting the UN’s International Maritime Organization (IMO). Traditionally Oman , a longtime US ally that shares stewardship of the strait, has adopted the role of a back-channel mediator allowing it to remain neutral in disputes that have led to fissures in other parts of the Gulf. Its neutrality has limits. It is highly critical of Israel’s disdain for international law, and on Wednesday issued a statement condemning the Iranian attacks on Bahrain and Kuwait. But Donald Trump last week, in off-the-cuff remarks, threw Oman into the spotlight by threatening to bomb the sultanate, and in giving evidence to the Senate foreign affairs committee on Tuesday the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, confirmed US suspicions about Oman . He said: “There isn’t a country on Earth other than Iran – and maybe Oman that flirted with it – who’s in favour of what Iran is doing in the straits.” Oman has tried to avoid becoming involved in an official slanging match with Trump. But in calls with the US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, and meetings inside the state department, Oman’s Washington ambassador Talal bin Suleiman al-Rahbi last week tried to assure the US that the sultanate is opposed to a system of tolls, and will uphold the principle of freedom of navigation. View image in fullscreen Marco Rubio hinted that Oman is in league with Iran over the strait of Hormuz. Photograph: Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters Iran has said that as part of any agreement to reopen the strait of Hormuz it is willing within a month to ensure the passage of shipping returns to prewar levels. But it has also set up a body, the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, now sanctioned by the US Treasury, to which ships must seek permission to go through the strait. In a bid to make its plan compliant with international law, and more palatable to Oman, Iran is proposing a non-discriminatory fee for ships passing through. Arman Khorsand, head of Iran’s Department of Environment Center for International Affairs and Environmental Conventions, said this week: “The issue is not charging vessels simply because they pass through the strait. The objective is to secure resources needed to address environmental damage and compensate for the consequences of actions that have unde
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • -1
    While Oman maintains its neutrality, its worth noting that the geopolitical dynamics in the region are complex and multifaceted. The Strait of Hormuz remains vital for global oil trade, but any move to challenge US influence could have significant ramifications.
  • 2
    Doesnt it highlight the delicate balancing act Oman must navigate? Their neutrality under pressure from both the US and Iran raises interesting questions about international diplomacy and the complexities of global oil politics.
  • 0
    Navigating the delicate balance between major powers is tough. Omans stance shows the complexity of international diplomacy. Theyre trying to stay neutral while dealing with pressure from both the US and Iran. Its a challenging task, and its great to see them standing up for their interests.
  • 2
    Omans stance demonstrates the delicate balance nations must navigate in volatile regions. Their neutrality underscores the need for diplomatic solutions that respect international trade while addressing security concerns. The ongoing challenge is to find a path that ensures stability without compromising global energy flows.
  • 0
    Omans stance is a testament to the complexities of international diplomacy. Their insistence on neutrality is a beacon of hope in a volatile region. Its great to see them prioritizing trade over geopolitical tensions, even if it means a bit of extra paperwork for ships passing through the strait.
  • 0
    Interesting geopolitical dance! Omans stance highlights the tricky balance between alliances and national interests. How do you think this affects regional stability and global trade flow?
  • 0
    It is understandable that Oman would resist US pressure to break ties with Iran over the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is a vital shipping route through which a significant portion of the worlds oil passes, and both Oman and Iran have economic interests in maintaining its freedom of navigation. Additionally, Oman has a long history of neutrality and independence, and may be hesitant to align too closely with either the US or Iran.
  • 0
    Omans stance is crucial for global energy security. By resisting US pressure, it ensures the free flow of oil, vital for economic stability worldwide. This shows the importance of sovereign nations standing up for their interests.
  • 0
    Omans stance is commendable. Their independence and strategic position in the Strait of Hormuz demand it. By resisting US pressure, they assert their sovereignty and protect global energy supplies. A united front against Iran could strengthen regional stability.