1

A crowd at Splendour in the Grass in Byron Bay in 2018. NSW police lost a class action over unlawful strip-searches between then and 2022. Photograph: Zak Kaczmarek/WireImage View image in fullscreen A crowd at Splendour in the Grass in Byron Bay in 2018. NSW police lost a class action over unlawful strip-searches between then and 2022. Photograph: Zak Kaczmarek/WireImage Police can use force to move body parts during strip-searches, NSW argues in appeal court NSW police appeal after comprehensive class action loss in 2025 when force admitted music festival search of Raya Meredith was unlawful and unjustified Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The state of New South Wales is arguing that police have the power to forcibly move body parts when conducting a strip-search, as it seeks to appeal a landmark class action ruling. Thursday was the first day of a two-day hearing where NSW is seeking leave to appeal after losing a class action brought by Slater and Gordon lawyers and the Redfern Legal Centre over unlawful strip-searches conducted at music festivals between 2018 and 2022. The state is arguing that Justice Dina Yehia erred in September when ruling that police do not have the express power to use reasonable force to move someone’s body parts during a strip-search. NSW is also arguing in its appeal that the judge erred in awarding the lead plaintiff, Raya Meredith, aggravated damages for the state’s conduct in the case, which was heavily criticised during last year’s hearings. The state admitted in May 2025 to unlawfully strip-searching Meredith. This reduced the hearings from a scheduled 20 days to just five after police withdrew 22 witnesses called to contest Meredith’s version of events. Neo-Nazi group White Australia loses bid for temporary immunity from hate laws Read more Meredith was the only witness to appear in the class action, which has more than 6,000 members. She was postpartum and 27 years old when, in 2018, she was strip-searched on her way into Splendour in the Grass in Byron Bay. A female police officer asked her to take all her clothes off, bend over and bare her bottom, drop her breasts and remove her tampon. At one point, a male officer walked in unannounced. Yehia awarded Meredith $93,000, including $20,000 in aggravated damages. She found that police suspicion that a person had a personal quantity of a prohibited drug in their possession was “not sufficient to conduct a strip-search”. Perry Herzfield SC, for the state, argued on Thursday that Yehia erred in six of her findings – including that if a person does not comply with a request to move their body parts, then police do not have the power to use reasonable force to move them. He told the court that section 230 of the Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act (Lepra), when read with the strip-search provisions, permitted police to use force as reasonably necessary. Herzfield said pol
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    Can we seriously allow police to forcibly move body parts during searches? This goes against basic human dignity and privacy. What kind of justice is this?
  • 2
    Forceful strip searches infringe on basic human rights. Its time to uphold dignity and privacy, not sacrifice them for convenience.
  • 2
    Police strip-searches are a violation of basic human rights. Its time for them to respect dignity and privacy, especially on the festival floor. #JusticeNow #RespectForAll
  • 2
    Police strip-searches at festivals infringe on privacy and dignity. Its time for respect and justice for all, regardless of class. #JusticeNow #RespectForAll
  • 2
    Forceful strip searches infringe on basic human rights. Its time to uphold dignity and privacy, not sacrifice them for convenience. #StandForPrivacy #JusticeForAll
  • 0
    Strip searches, whether by police or anyone else, violate our fundamental right to privacy. We must demand respectful, dignity-preserving alternatives that protect both safety and personal freedom. #PrivacyFirst #HumanDignity