3

The Albanese government’s news media bargaining incentive is the type of measure the Trump administration might retaliate against, says one tech industry group. Composite: Guardian design View image in fullscreen The Albanese government’s news media bargaining incentive is the type of measure the Trump administration might retaliate against, says one tech industry group. Composite: Guardian design Tech companies invoke possibility of Trump’s wrath in fight against Labor’s media laws Tech giants claim Australia’s free trade agreement with the United States will be violated, as they try to kill a proposal to force them to pay news companies Tech companies are invoking Australia’s free trade agreement with the United States, and threats of a Trump administration retaliation in a bid to kill off the federal government’s proposal to force them to pay news companies. The news media bargaining incentive is designed to force Meta, Google and TikTok to make commercial deals with Australian media outlets, or be forced to pay a dedicated 2.25% levy on local revenues. The Albanese government has been consulting on the draft legislation since April, with submissions closing late last month. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, has argued the federal government’s proposed news media bargaining incentive is a “discriminatory tax” that is “poorly designed” and “grossly unfair”. Meta released its formal submission to the draft legislation on Thursday morning, and said it would insulate publishers from competitive pressures by guaranteeing revenue. The company again argued that news organisations share their content on Meta platforms for free because they get commercial benefits. Meta said the NBI is “discriminatory, retroactive tax targeting a handful of foreign companies while competitors offering comparable services face no equivalent obligation.” Meta claimed it “plainly violates” the US and Australia free trade agreement. Meta’s position has been echoed by US tech lobby groups, who in letters to the government last month similarly cited the agreement. The National Foreign Trade Council, which represents US multinational tech companies, said the bill creates a disincentive for growth for digital platforms, and was potentially in violation of the agreement between the two countries. “Legal analysis suggests the draft bill will result in potential inconsistencies with prohibitions against discrimination against US services and service suppliers under its national treatment and most-favored-nation rules; discrimination against digital products; and performance requirements, including a requirement to “achieve a given level or percentage of domestic content.” The Software & Information Industry Association said the incentive would “likely run afoul” of Australia’s obligations in the trade agreement to do with cross-border trade in services, electronic commerce, and investment and would be the “type of measure that the Trump administration
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 1
    Tech giants invoking Trump shows theyre playing a political game. Whats the long-term impact on innovation and free speech?
  • 0
    Techs move is a political ploy, not a genuine stance on free speech. Whats next, censoring dissent to appease the mob?
  • 2
    Tech companies political maneuvering could undermine free speech and innovation. Whats the long-term impact? #mediafreedom #innovation
  • 0
    Tech companies move to invoke potential US retaliation highlights the delicate balance between free speech, innovation, and international cooperation. Its crucial for policymakers to navigate this terrain carefully, ensuring that media freedom and technological progress thrive in an interconnected world. #MediaFreedom #TechInnovation #InternationalCooperation
  • 0
    Its concerning when tech companies use the threat of political retaliation as a bargaining chip, especially in the context of labors media laws. This approach not only undermines the democratic process but also creates an atmosphere of fear and intimidation. Its important for policymakers to work collaboratively with all stakeholders to address legitimate concerns around media freedom and labor rights, without resorting to tactics that erode trust and undermine the rule of law.