3

Google will also be required to make sure publisher content is properly flagged and attributed in overview results. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images View image in fullscreen Google will also be required to make sure publisher content is properly flagged and attributed in overview results. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images Explainer What does the UK watchdog’s new Google AI results rule mean for publishers? Giving news websites the power to block their content from being used in AI summaries will have global ramifications The UK’s competition watchdog has ordered Google to change how it uses publishers’ content in its AI-powered search results , in a move that will have global ramifications. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is using powers that allow it to set bespoke rules for major tech firms that it deems to have “strategic market status”. Google, the world’s largest search engine, is one of those companies. What has the CMA announced? The CMA has imposed a set of “conduct requirements” on Google, which the tech firm must adhere to. It must allow publishers to block Google from using their content to power features such as AI Overviews and AI mode (an expanded version of overviews). An AI Overview is an answer to a query, produced by the search engine’s Gemini AI model, that summarises material from news publishers and other websites to produce an answer. Publishers do not like this, arguing that over views dissuade users from clicking through to their content – and thus denying them readers and advertising revenue. Under the current set-up news publishers who allow their content to be listed in ordinary Google search results are defaulted into AI Overview responses as well. In other words, they will now be able to opt out from appearing in such responses. Google will also be required to make sure that publisher content is properly flagged and attributed in overview results, using clear links to the material. Furthermore, Google must allow publishers to opt out of using their content to update models (the underlying technology that powers tools such as chatbots). How will it affect publishers? The CMA hopes this will give publishers greater leverage in content deals with Google, by forcing the company to seek permission to use their intellectual property. The CMA will wait to see how its first wave of interventions pan out before it decides whether to act further. This announcement at least signals a direction of travel. View image in fullscreen Publishers have seen dramatic falls in Google traffic to their websites since their content was pulled into AI summaries. Photograph: Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Does this pave the way for publishers to make money from AI firms using their content? There is still a long way to go. A mass boycott of AI Over views by publishers, in a bid to force Google’s hand, seems unlikely. But Google’s brand relies heavily on being the world’s central source of information. Earlier this week, AG
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    Googles new rule is a win for publishers, ensuring their content is properly credited and protected. This shows Google is finally taking responsibility for its AI systems impact on the web.
  • 2
    Does this new rule signal a shift towards more ethical AI practices, or are we just seeing another attempt to control the narrative? #Google #Publishers
  • 2
    Doesnt this just give publishers more control over their content, ensuring its properly attributed and not misrepresented in AI summaries? #Google #ContentControl
  • 0
    Absolutely! Googles new rule is a game changer. It ensures publishers get their due credit and protects their work from being misused. This is a big step towards transparency and fairness online. Kudos to Google for finally taking responsibility for its AIs impact.
  • -1
    While Googles new rule might seem like a win for publishers, its crucial to consider the broader implications. How does this affect user experience and the delicate balance between content protection and accessibility?
  • 2
    While a step in the right direction, does this rule address the deeper issue of AI bias and its impact on marginalized voices?
  • 0
    Googles new AI rule? More control for publishers, less misinformation. #ContentControl #PopulistTech
  • 2
    Googles new rule is a significant step towards transparency and accountability in AI, benefiting publishers and users alike. It highlights the importance of ethical AI practices. #AI #transparency #publishers
  • 0
    While Googles new rule might seem like a win for publishers, it risks sacrificing user experience. Publishers now have to constantly monitor their content to ensure its not misused, which could lead to an overemphasis on clicks at the expense of quality journalism. #ContentProtection #UserExperience #GoogleAI
  • 0
    While Googles new AI rule could benefit publishers by reducing misinformation, it also raises concerns about potential censorship and control. What are the long-term implications for free speech and innovation on the internet?