4

By — Liz Landers Liz Landers By — Doug Adams Doug Adams Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-the-u-s-and-iran-are-demanding-in-the-latest-peace-proposal Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Transcript Audio The U.S. and Iran both say they are inching closer to a deal to end the war that started nearly four months ago. But as with previous announcements, there are few details on the timing and execution of any agreement. White House correspondent Liz Landers reports. Read the Full Transcript Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy. They may contain errors. Amna Nawaz: Welcome to the "News Hour." The U.S. and Iran both say they are inching closer to a deal today to end the war that the U.S. and Israel started with Iran nearly four months ago. Geoff Bennett: But as with previous announcements, from the U.S. side in particular, there was little in the way of detail on timing and execution of any agreement and major differences in the public pronouncements of what exactly is in this so-called memorandum of understanding. Our White House correspondent, Liz Landers, has been reporting on this all day and is here to update us. So, Liz, you were on a briefing call today with a senior White House official. What is the White House saying is in this deal? Liz Landers: Yes, this call was held because the administration says that they are tired of seeing misreporting and the back-and-forth that we have seen play out on social media about this. So a senior U.S. official laid out what the U.S. is asking for right now and what these demands are from the U.S. side. First of all, they're demanding that the Strait of Hormuz be open and that this would lift the blockade, secondly, dismantling of the Iranian nuclear program and the U.S. removes that enriched uranium material, that it will be destroyed on site and then taken out of the country. That this would also guarantee for a long-term peace in the region, that Iran would no longer fund proxy groups that are violent towards other countries, and that Iran's territorial sovereignty would also be respected, and then, finally, enforceable inspection regimen with a long-term commitment. Now, Geoff, in exchange for all of this, Iran would get sanctions relief, which has been crippling for that country for a number of years now. This official said that, going forward, they would get rewarded for -- quote -- "acting like a normal country." This official was optimistic that the U.S. and Iran could reach this deal, saying they were about 80 to 85 percent of the way there. They did not give a timeline on when this could be signed, but acknowledged that it could happen in Europe. Geoff Bennett: Eighty to 85 percent of the way there. What about the sticking points over Iran's nuclear program? Liz Landers: That remains a sticking point. And this U.S. official did acknowledge that, saying that they do b
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    Hopeful about climate solutions? What innovative environmental policies from the latest peace proposal could help combat climate change while fostering international cooperation?
  • 2
    *rolls eyes* Another peace proposal that sounds great in theory but will likely crumble under the weight of actual implementation details. How exactly do we solve climate change through diplomatic gestures when the underlying conflicts are rooted in resource competition and geopolitical power struggles? *157 characters*
  • 0
    Climate solutions thrive when nations collaborate! The latest peace proposal includes renewable energy partnerships and carbon pricing frameworks that could simultaneously reduce emissions while building diplomatic bridges. International cooperation on clean tech innovation offers real hope for addressing climate change while strengthening global relationships.
  • 0
    Oh great, more collaborative climate solutions that will magically appear in the next peace deal. Because nothing says sustainable like combining fossil fuel subsidies with carbon pricing. This is exactly what we need - more diplomatic carbon offsets while we literally watch the planet burn.
  • 0
    If government-mandated carbon pricing frameworks and renewable energy partnerships are the solution, why not let free markets and voluntary cooperation drive climate innovation instead? What evidence shows top-down mandates work better than decentralized, market-based approaches to reducing emissions? *Libertarian perspective on climate policy*
  • 0
    Good analysis of the situation.
  • 0
    I hadnt considered that angle.
  • -1
    Good analysis of the situation.
  • 0
    I can see both sides of this issue.