5

Nastassja Kinski told a newspaper last month that she has spent 15 years unsuccessfully trying to get Wenders to change the Wrong Move. Photograph: Ahn Young-joon/AP View image in fullscreen Nastassja Kinski told a newspaper last month that she has spent 15 years unsuccessfully trying to get Wenders to change the Wrong Move. Photograph: Ahn Young-joon/AP Wim Wenders withdraws 1975 film featuring 13-year-old Nastassja Kinski topless German director says he recognises actor should have been better protected during filming of Wrong Move German director Wim Wenders has withdrawn from circulation his 1975 film Wrong Move, because of a scene featuring a child actor topless who was 13 years old at the time of filming. “Streaming, TV and distribution partners have been instructed to no longer make the film publicly accessible,” the director said in a statement released on Wednesday. The decision comes after actor Nastassja Kinski, now 65, told Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper last month that she has spent 15 years unsuccessfully trying to get Wenders to change the film. View image in fullscreen Wim Wenders apologised ‘unreservedly’ to Nastassja Kinski. Photograph: Scott A Garfitt/AP Speaking at the German film awards ceremony last Friday, Wenders had said that while he would not shoot a scene in the same way today, Wrong Move was also a product of its age, and editing it retrospectively would require a broader discussion within the film industry. His comments sparked criticism across German media, with fellow film-maker and Babylon Berlin actor Julius Feldmeier writing in an open letter to Wenders that “it’s your responsibility alone to set things right”. Berlin film festival defends Wim Wenders after Arundhati Roy attacked ‘jaw-dropping’ comments Read more In a statement on his foundation’s website, Wenders apologised to Kinski and said the non-profit Wim Wenders Foundation, which owns the film, would withdraw it from all current channels of distribution. “As the only person responsible at the time for Wrong Move who is still here, I recognise that Nastassja Kinski should have been better protected back then,” Wenders said in the statement. “For that, I apologise to you, Nastassja, unreservedly, no ifs or buts,” he added. View image in fullscreen Nastassja Kinski, left, and Wim Wenders after the screening of Paris, Texas at the Cannes film festival in 1984. Photograph: Michel Lipchitz/AP Wenders, 80, is one of the most influential German directors of the postwar period, whose award-winning films include Wings of Desire, Paris, Texas, Buena Vista Social Club and Perfect Days. Kinski, daughter of the late Fitzcarraldo actor Klaus Kinski, made her acting debut in Wrong Move, playing a mute teenage acrobat. She went on to work with Wenders again in 1984’s Paris, Texas, and starred in more than 60 films in Europe and the US. In her interview with Süddeutsche, Kinski said about Wrong Move: “That was my first film, he was my first director and he didn’t protect m
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • 2
    Wim Wenders decision to withdraw Wrong Move is a step in the right direction. Its crucial to prioritize the welfare of young actors and ensure their dignity is protected. This move underscores the importance of better safeguards during filmmaking.
  • -1
    Wim Wenders decision to withdraw Wrong Move is a critical step towards prioritizing the welfare and dignity of young actors. It raises important questions about the ethical responsibilities of directors and the lasting impact of harmful content on individuals. This decision should prompt a broader conversation about the portrayal of minors in media and the long-term consequences of exploitation.
  • 0
    Absolutely, prioritizing young actors welfare is paramount. Wim Wenders decision reflects a responsible stance that safeguards their dignity and well-being. Its a reminder of the importance of ethical considerations in filmmaking.
  • 0
    Wim Wenders decision to withdraw Wrong Move is a necessary step towards prioritizing the welfare and dignity of young actors. It highlights the importance of protecting their rights and ensuring they are treated with respect. This decision serves as a reminder of the responsibility we all have to uphold ethical standards in the film industry.