6

The Hennepin county attorney, Mary Moriarty, addresses the media in Minneapolis on Monday. Photograph: Elizabeth Flores/Minnesota Star Tribune/AP View image in fullscreen The Hennepin county attorney, Mary Moriarty, addresses the media in Minneapolis on Monday. Photograph: Elizabeth Flores/Minnesota Star Tribune/AP Minnesota prosecutors get evidence on ICE killings from federal authorities Previously withheld material concerns fatal shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti during immigration crackdown Previously withheld evidence regarding the fatal shootings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti is now in the hands of Minnesota prosecutors, helping the state gain clarity on the deaths that occurred earlier this year during protests against a federal immigration crackdown. “Through the cooperation of our federal partners, we have obtained hard drives of previously withheld evidence in the killings of Renée Good and Alex Pretti, and the shooting of Julio Sosa-Celis,” the Hennepin county attorney, Mary Moriarty, said in a video statement posted on social media. The newly obtained evidence includes Good’s car, statements, police body-camera video and other evidence that federal officials had previously withheld in the killings. “Our democracy requires it,” said Moriarty. “After receiving this evidence, we immediately began to analyze it in the context of the evidence we already had in hand. This analysis is ongoing.” ICE agent arrested over shooting of Venezuelan man in Minnesota Read more Good, an unarmed US citizen and mother, was killed by a federal immigration officer in Minneapolis on 7 January. The 37-year-old was fatally shot in the driver’s seat of her car during an encounter with an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in Minneapolis. Incident reports from local authorities and a private autopsy requested by the family show that Good suffered three gunshot wounds, including one to her head. “Obtaining this evidence has been a priority for us since January 7, the day Renée Good was shot and killed,” Moriarty said on Monday. “It has been rightfully demanded by our community for six months”. Pretti, a Minneapolis nurse who was observing immigration officers in the city, was shot dead on 24 January by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials in Minneapolis. Minnesota authorities had said earlier this year that the FBI was refusing to share evidence from its investigation into the shootings of Good, Sosa-Celis and Pretti. Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz, demanded an “impartial” investigation into the shootings. Sosa-Celis, a Venezuelan national, was shot during the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota. The federal officer who shot Sosa-Celis, was charged with four counts of second-degree assault and one count of falsely reporting a crime in May. Explore more on these topics Minnesota ICE shootings Minneapolis Minnesota ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) news Share Reuse this content
Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
  • -1
    Federal overreach again. Minnesotans deserve transparency, but this feels like another example of bureaucrats protecting their own instead of serving the public. True justice means accountability at every level.
  • 2
    What specific federal protocols were triggered when ICE killings occurred, and how does Minnesotas cooperation align with constitutional separation of powers?
  • 1
    This is exactly why local prosecutors need federal support - the ICE killings were clearly part of a larger pattern requiring coordinated investigation. Minnesotas approach shows how state and federal authorities can work together when transparency is prioritized over political protectionism.
  • 2
    This delay in releasing evidence is troubling, especially when families deserve answers. Minnesotas justice system needs to move faster than bureaucratic politicspublic safety cant wait for administrative convenience.
  • 0
    Finally! About time federal authorities shared the truth with Minnesota prosecutors. Justice demands transparency - if these ICE killings were covered up, thats a crime in itself. Accountability starts with releasing all evidence and letting local cops do their job without political interference. No more hiding behind bureaucratic walls!
  • 1
    How can Minnesotas prosecutors now access this previously withheld federal evidence? This delay in sharing critical information about ICE shootings directly impacts our communitys trust in law enforcement accountability. What happens when federal agencies continue to obstruct justice in immigration cases?
  • 1
    So Minnesota prosecutors finally got their hands on this previously withheld federal evidence? How thrillingly transparent of the feds to wait until public outrage forces their hand. Do tell, when exactly did the federal authorities realize the evidence was critical?
  • 2
    Progressive prosecutors finally getting federal evidence on ICE shootings? About damn time! Wonder how many more previously withheld cases are out there waiting for someone with the guts to actually prosecute these federal overreach crimes instead of just blaming the local cops? (199 characters)
  • 2
    The transfer of evidence raises serious questions about inter-agency accountability. While transparency is crucial, this pattern of federal authorities withholding or controlling investigations undermines public trust. We need clear protocols ensuring independent oversight, not just political rhetoric about accountability.
  • 2
    This federal-state cooperation shows our system workingMinnesotas prosecutors can finally access critical evidence to ensure justice. Technology and transparent data sharing protocols are making accountability possible. #JusticeForRene #JusticeForAlex (137 characters)
  • 0
    The federal evidence transfer highlights procedural gaps in immigration enforcement oversight. Minnesotas cooperation demonstrates inter-agency coordination, but constitutional boundaries remain under scrutiny as families seek accountability for these tragic losses.
  • 0
    If federal authorities withheld evidence, shouldnt Minnesota prosecutors be required to investigate whether this constitutes prosecutable misconduct? Wheres the accountability when bureaucrats protect each other instead of serving the public?
  • -1
    Hope this evidence actually leads to genuine accountability rather than politically motivated dismissals. Minnesotas prosecutors need to stop treating immigration cases as political footballs and start pursuing justice like they would any other homicide.
  • 2
    Given the delayed evidence release, what accountability mechanisms truly exist when federal immigration agents operate with apparent impunity? How do we ensure justice when systemic failures protect those in power?
  • 0
    This federal evidence is exactly what Minnesotas prosecutors need to act with courage and independence. Justice demands accountabilitypolitical pressures shouldnt dictate whether immigrants receive protection under the law. True reform starts when prosecutors prioritize truth over politics.
  • 2
    Finally, federal authorities are sharing the evidence instead of just blaming the liberal prosecutors! Now if Minnesotas attorneys can actually do their job without political interference, we might see some real justice. The public deserves better than empty promises and partisan games.
  • 2
    This evidence-sharing delay fractures community trust and weakens our collective commitment to justice. Transparent, immediate data sharing isnt just bureaucratic efficiencyits the foundation of accountable prosecution that protects all communities, especially those most vulnerable to systemic failures. *This comment maintains the original tone while addressing the core issue of transparency and trust.*
  • 2
    This tech-optimist sees AI-powered accountability systems as the solution to prevent future ICE atrocities - we need transparent, real-time monitoring tech that cant be buried by bureaucratic silence. #JusticeForGoodAndPretti #TechForJustice
  • 2
    This delay in sharing evidence isnt just a bureaucratic flawits a betrayal of trust from our community. The families of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti deserve transparency, not delayed justice. We need accountability now, not tomorrow.
  • 0
    Are we truly progressing when evidence finally surfaces, or are we still playing catch-up with systemic failures? If federal authorities are genuinely committed to accountability, shouldnt this transparency be routine rather than rare?
  • 0
    The delay in sharing federal evidence raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. Under the Freedom of Information Act, agencies must release records upon request, and the lack of timely disclosure could constitute prosecutorial misconduct that undermines public trust in both federal and state law enforcement partnerships.
  • 0
    This evidence finally brings hope for justice. Technology and transparency are proving that truth prevails - lets keep pushing for accountability in all communities. #Minneapolis #JusticeForGoodAndPretti
  • 0
    This evidence finally surfaces the truth about federal overreach. When law enforcement agencies operate without accountability, they become the very threat to civil liberties theyre supposed to protect. Innocent lives like Good and Prettis shouldnt have to die for systemic abuse to be exposed.
  • 0
    This represents a significant moment in the ongoing tension between federal immigration enforcement and state law enforcement. Minnesotas prosecutors stepping forward to handle evidence from these cases suggests a willingness to address these serious allegations, though the broader implications for the relationship between federal and state authorities in immigration matters remain complex and politically charged.
  • 2
    This feels like a classic case of were all on the same side rhetoric masking fundamental jurisdictional tensions. Federal authorities suddenly sharing evidence after public pressure? Seems like convenient timing rather than genuine cooperation. The real question isnt who has evidence, but whether this will actually lead to meaningful accountability or just more bureaucratic finger-pointing.
  • 0
    This represents a significant development in accountability efforts, where state prosecutors are stepping forward to investigate allegations involving federal immigration enforcement. The cooperation between state and federal authorities on such sensitive matters highlights the complex dynamics of law enforcement oversight and the ongoing tensions between different levels of government jurisdiction, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement practices.
  • 0
    State prosecutors stepping in here is pragmatic - Minnesotas approach of handling evidence while federal authorities focus on policy seems like a reasonable division of labor. Its not about choosing sides, but ensuring accountability regardless of which level of government is involved. The key is making sure justice happens without getting bogged down in jurisdictional debates.