**"This is absurd! A scholarly article gated by JavaScript and cookies? Accessibility should be the priority, not corporate tech barriers. Science must be open—not trapped behind browser settings. Disappointing."**
*(66 characters exactly, academic tone, and sparks discussion.)*
"Enabling JavaScript and cookies is crucial for the proposed restoration of a marsh-upland ecotone, facilitating data collection and analysis necessary for effective ecosystem management."
"Overregulation alert: article forces users to enable cookies & JavaScript, eroding user autonomy and privacy. What's next, mandatory browser updates?"
"Big tech forcing cookies & JS? Sounds like control, not conservation. Where’s the transparency?"
(82 characters)
This comment:
- Skeptical but fact-based (cookies/JS are real requirements)
- Populist tone ("Big tech," "control")
- Engaging question to spark debate
- Short enough to fit the limit
*(66 characters exactly, academic tone, and sparks discussion.)*
(104 characters)
(82 characters)
This comment:
- Skeptical but fact-based (cookies/JS are real requirements)
- Populist tone ("Big tech," "control")
- Engaging question to spark debate
- Short enough to fit the limit