From a 'day of love' to 'if they spit, we will hit': Trump's about-face on violence against police

"Oh no! I've just heard the scariest thing of all. They found some really bad gnarly spider bite on my neck."

I’m not surprised that the UFC has announced they will no longer perform any events outside of their home state of Nevada. The last time we saw them live was at the T-Mobile Arena last year during this fight against Conor McGregor. 😡"

I feel like I'm in an alternate reality where people actually believe what they read on the internet."

😂 Oh man, this is really out of hand! It's like an episode of The Simpsons crossed with National Geographic. I mean, seriously? How many people need cameras all over their bodies?"

"It's so unbelievable. The government is hiding crucial information from me."

"I can't believe they just made those rules up."

I'm glad you asked me because it means I'm not alone. But seriously, it’s so frustrating that we can't just turn on the machines that make all this possible."

😮 It's great that they found something! I can’t wait to see where this leads them. They said there were no signs of foul play so I have high hopes for their success in identifying who did this.

"This is so ridiculous! The internet has become such a big waste of time! Why can't we have better technology? People need to stop worrying about what others think."

"I hope we can fix this mess."

😠 The stock market has plunged by over 30% since President Trump took office. It's like I just lost my job! #F**KTHEESTPRESIDENT IN HISTORY"

Why did I see this in my phone's lock screen? Is it some sort of security feature? Or is there something sinister going on here?"

🙄 Well, this is... not exactly sure what I want to say! Anyway, I guess it's better that way since our government likes to censor things anyway."

👻 Hey everybody! I know this isn't an official statement, but let me tell you how disappointed I am with that horrendous law. It completely undermined my trust in our legal system by targeting innocent citizens without any merit whatsoever."
```

"Ugh, I can't believe it! They have to do with our environment, right? How is this happening?"

😞 I'm so happy for my family but sad for all those affected by this terrible tragedy. It's like a nightmare come true! 🥺

So, this whole vaccine thing is causing a lot of debate. I can see where some people might have questions."

RESPONSE FROM A REALISTIC PERSON (SKEPTICAL TONE):

"Cool! Imagine having a superhero shield that protects you against all diseases and germs, right? Good luck with those questions!"

This is such an incredible opportunity! I've always wanted to travel around the world. Finally getting the chance on my 18th birthday! Can you believe how lucky we all are? The world truly is our oyster!"

RESPONSE: Ah, this

"Holy shit, I'm gonna go outside just to smell some fresh air! It's too much pollution."

💩 Because I can't believe that they didn't even bother with basic safety measures."

I was talking about an article on how a new technology called "the internet of things" is set to revolutionize our lives

I'm so glad we can make this happen! It was an incredible opportunity for both of us to learn more about each other’s work and exchange ideas. Here is my recommendation for you, follow @InstagramStudios on Instagram to stay updated with their latest projects."

😒 Why does this happen to my computer? It's been acting really strange lately... I can't seem to figure out what's wrong with it.

😠 I can't believe people actually think this is a good idea! The COVID vaccine won't protect you against all variants! It could make things worse. They should have waited until they had more data before releasing it. People are just being irresponsible."

"I think this article is crap."

You mean like being a soldier defending our country against another nation while doing something wrong himself because he allowed others to act irresponsibly on his behalf?

So, Mr. President, your tolerance for violence against law enforcement during the January 6 capitol riot seems less forgiving than your treatment of protesters today. You've given amnesty to these individuals, but still maintain criticism towards the tens of thousands of peaceful protestors like me who demonstrated peacefully

The reason behind this criticism is the fact that Trump initially supported a peaceful protest movement, but changed his tune once the nation became divided due to his rhetoric around the incident involving the police. As a result, these critical incidents are causing concern among people who are trying to balance fair representation while preserving the integrity of our legal system.

So let me see, does this mean that since the riots happened (which was actually just a day of chaos), the government should start cracking down on peaceful protests again? Because we saw what happened in Los Angeles, and it clearly shows that our current approach isn't working well.

I would like to see the article again to make sure I understand its main points correctly but overall, Trump's about-face on violence against police and praising violent individuals like Capitol Hill police officers seems contradictory given his role as a Republican presidential candidate and critic of law enforcement conduct in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore.

This sounds like a rant by a sore loser, trying to score points by criticizing President Trump without actually supporting his ideas. It doesn't demonstrate understanding of the issues involved; rather, it comes off as cheap insults and unsupported opinions.

So does it mean that Trump doesn't care about peace and law but is focused solely on maintaining power at all costs?

Sure, I agree with the choice of words – use a language that could potentially cause an incident like the one in California between protesters and the police. Additionally, I think focusing solely on Trump's behavior towards protesters might create a misunderstanding; most politicians show grace and understanding towards protesters while still conducting business according to laws.

My question regarding President Donald Trump's response to protestors is whether he truly wants to keep the peace and avoid further incidents like the riots at the U.S. Capitol last month. Also, could he explain the reason behind his decision to deploy the Marines into Los Angeles?

(Regarding the story above) How does the lack of accountability for violence against law enforcement reflect on the situation regarding January 6, 2021 riots and President Donald Trump's involvement in them?

Why doesn't the government arrest those responsible for causing harm like they were allowed to do prior to January 6th, 2021?

Sure! But just give me the link where you shared the text. Also, please ensure that the text adheres to our guidelines, such as proper grammar, punctuation, and formatting (such as bold, italics, and quotes). Additionally, make sure the original author has agreed to allow their work being published elsewhere, especially if it involves sensitive subjects like politics or government

"Look, the situation in LA really sucks. There needs to be a better solution for handling situations like this. Fix the broken windows, clean up the streets, etc. Also, give peace, justice, and dignity to everyone involved in these incidents."

(Your comment here)

If I was running to become president, I would definitely support law enforcement on January 6. However, I understand the complexities involved in ensuring public safety while maintaining order within our society. Imagine ICE being given authority

There seems to be a significant contradiction between comments made in the article and facts provided. Trump does not support violence against law enforcement, nor has he requested the use of force or the National Guard to stop the riots at the Capitol. His administration is about to announce new penalties for individuals who engage in violence against law enforcement, but this information contradicts statements made previously suggesting otherwise.

I think President Trump is doing a good job fighting crime on behalf of the American public. His decision to use force against rioting is understandable given the potential danger to life and property. However, it seems like he is getting carried away, pushing boundaries without fully understanding the consequences of such decisions. Instead of being so quick to deploy soldiers to quell

"What kind of clown are you anyway? Seriously!"

As you may know, the situation involving a large gathering at the Capitol during the January 6th insurrection has garnered significant attention around the world. While some argue whether President Donald Trump should have handled the situation

It is fascinating how things can seem so dramatic but often, just like a movie plot, certain elements play out differently depending on whether the main character is being presented as good or bad.

So the president really does like violence against police, doesn't he?

"Okay, let me break this down step by step. Firstly, President Trump is defending himself after being accused of tolerating violence against law enforcement during a rally supporting himself. Secondly, he claims that the US Capitol and its personnel were unfairly targeted and harassed during the incident because of our invol

(Informative) Sure thing. But remember, the pardon doesn't mean his words weren't true; the charges won't disappear just because he apologizes; and holding onto power doesn't make things better. So don't expect immediate results like "America First."

Why do you think people are surprised and upset about President Donald Trump pardoning individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol?

*Response* My apologies, but the provided information appears to come directly from President Donald Trump himself – as well as the people around him, like Giuliani – and is not representative of the reality of the situation. It seems that you are looking for clarification regarding President Trump’s comments concerning the January 6th riots and whether there was actually a specific reason given for his

Hey everyone, remember when we used to laugh and joke about being a "little girl next door" because of my quirks and charms? Well, I guess it wasn't quite funny anymore since Donald Trump made me a target. But let me tell you something, I am ready for battle and I won't back down! As our nation goes through its darkest hour, I want us all to

Oh dear, my friend. So, according to this news article, President Donald Trump seems to think that holding onto power means doing whatever it takes to maintain that authority. His speech and actions appear to indicate that violence and intimidation should not deter him from achieving his goals, no matter how reckless or immoral they may seem. The question posed above asks what the impact of his actions on the citizens affected by the January 6 event might be.

Imagine you live in a place like El Salvador, and someone breaks into your house. Instead of calling the police, you decide to fight back with your own weapons. Your neighborhood gets invaded because of your arson attacks, leaving your friends fearing for their lives. Eventually, you become known as the “terrorist behind the fires” and end up in jail. How

(Your comment goes here.)

So, Mr. Trump is punishing law enforcement by deploying the military instead of giving them the necessary training or equipment to handle things like protestors turning violent (like the LA situation), and by not allowing them to deal with the riots coming from his own side. He should think twice before deciding to make such moves again. He needs to realize that his actions might cause further harm to law enforcement and potentially endanger lives.

Trump is acting like a child again, but this time, he's playing Russian roulette with American democracy. His desire to defend himself against any threat makes him seem like a maniac with zero respect for the rule of law.

<p><strong>"The difference between being a humanitarian and being a politician is that politicians always act like victims.</strong></p>

So, the reason people are angry with the news stories from January 6, 2021, is because Trump allowed the farce known as the Jan. 6 insurrection to happen instead of denouncing the thugs and calling on peaceful protesters to disperse immediately upon being ordered off the steps of the Capitol grounds?

So, let me explain my perspective towards this situation. I disagree with President Trump's decision to use federalized forces to protect himself rather than peaceful protesters like they deserve. His tolerance for violence against law enforcement and his refusal to hold accountable individuals responsible for inciting violence make his words sound hollow.

You know, sometimes it feels like a waste of time to reply to every news article. There is nothing new here—just another politician trying to impress everyone. I prefer my daily dose of drama over factual news. So no more comments from me on this subject.

So, Mr. Trump really wants everyone to know he's okay with violence? Is he just looking for publicity, or does he genuinely believe there aren't any consequences for his actions?

Fine, let's pretend this is happening in the middle of winter without knowing exactly who's doing what, but let's pick one time frame (say January 6) and see how this affects

The article appears to criticize President Donald Trump for being inconsistent when addressing the situation surrounding January 6, 2021, but does not offer alternative perspectives nor context. It seems like the author is looking for criticism towards Trump rather than seeking information regarding other opinions on the matter, although a few quotes might clarify certain details.

President Donald Trump is tolerant towards violence against law enforcement during the January 6 Capitol riots but made a dramatic gesture today to exert pressure on the Federal Government to protect its staff from potential harm due to increased security measures following the riot. He claimed victory, stating that his administration is successful in fighting against terrorism. However, critics argue

"Trump should have been removed from the presidency immediately after inciting violence at the US Capitol."

How does Trump respond to his latest criticism, given his long history of tolerating violence against law enforcement by his followers?

AMAZING!! So well written and thoughtful…thank you for sharing this information.

📚 Trump deserves praise for his decision to maintain calm and dignify the situation following the January 6 riots. His approach showcases the power of leadership and his commitment to upholding democratic values.

(Your comment goes here)

Fine. How does that fit into our discussion of whether Trump deserves praise or criticism based on the latest events at the Capitol involving his administration and the use of force against peaceful protesters?

As a straight caucasian male, I find it deeply troubling that President Trump has suddenly become the voice of reason, while advocating for violence against law enforcement. This is clearly inconsistent with our principles, especially given his support for QAnon conspiracies and anti-American rhetoric. Furthermore, his willingness to turn an institution like the US Capitol into a battle

Trump completely lost it after learning about the riots happening in Los Angeles. "The hell am I supposed to think about my safety?" Trump tweeted while criticizing the federal government's response to the riot. "Let me tell everyone how much I love being president and free," Trump continued. "I promise you though, I won't care about my safety or the wellbeing of law enforcement, especially if they stop protestors."

As someone who doesn't follow politics closely but understands the issues involved, let me explain why it seems like Democrats are trying to score points by criticizing President Trump for being "hospitable

I agree with the assessment of the situation by Trump regarding violence against law enforcement. However, the question is whether the current situation constitutes a "day of love." As far as the physical protection of civilians from violence, there is no definitive answer based solely on historical examples. Both the Trump administration and the general public may have differing interpretations and priorities concerning such issues.

I totally agree with this but think it should be made slightly more clear that President Trump doesn't seem too concerned with peaceful protestors being hurt or killed while trying to prevent another riot from happening. Also, it's interesting to note that historically,

ARE YOU CRYING FOR THE REAL HEART ATTACK VICTIMS OR FOR TRUMP AND HIS TOO MANY ADMINISTRATION (PELOS)? IF FOR TRUMP, THEN DO WHAT HE SAID – GET OUT OF LA AND TEACHER NEWST SCHOOLS LIKE AN AMERICAN (PHILLIPINE) IN NO

So does this mean that the President really did have plans for his own "big, beautiful bill," which would have provided record funding and resources to those on the front lines in Los Angeles against any future attacks like the incidents mentioned in the article?

So, the reason why I'm questioning these statements is because they appear to be inconsistent with how Mr. Trump handled violence against law enforcement while advocating for those who committed acts against peaceful protestors during the

Imagine if we used the same principles to treat someone like a child instead of another adult.

"This is an incredibly important and moving piece of journalism. You’ve painted a vivid picture of the chaos of January 6 – the lawlessness, the lack of support for our democracy, the fear and paranoia experienced by many of us involved. Your approach to the question deserves praise – using the language and insights of someone like Peter Singer

This entry seems like the kind of thing that should come straight from a politician's mouth. If such information were true, it'd mean that our current president (whose presidency you disagree) has made significant changes in policy, protection of civil liberties, law enforcement reform, etc. – things that are important

The difference between today's Republican Party and previous Republican parties lies primarily in its willingness to engage in violence against law enforcement officers, especially as demonstrated by the riots orchestrated in Washington DC following the inauguration of Joseph R. Biden Jr. The presence of armed police forces could potentially deter such acts, but given the current climate, they may become unnecessary.

There's nothing wrong with being supportive of the police as a whole. It's good to show solidarity and let everyone know we stand behind them. However, please realize that I am focused on the behavior and attitudes of President Donald Trump towards the police. His tweets and speeches consistently demonstrate his lack of

The difference between Los Angeles and January 6, 2021, is palpable; the riots left scars everywhere. But the core values behind the fight for democracy haven’t

As someone who values truth above all else and supports investigative journalism, I would like to thank everyone involved in this thread for bringing us this important information. The main focus of the conversation should be on the consequences of the actions taken by President Trump following the insurrection event at the US Capitol last month. Discussion about policy changes, infrastructure investment and other related topics is welcome but should be kept separate from the article content.

Surely everyone understands that I am reacting to the situation regarding violence at the US Capitol since President Trump called on federal agents to use force on peaceful protesters who were trying to maintain order. His comments came after riots occurred throughout the nation, particularly in California.

There isn't enough information provided in this text to make a judgment about whether President Donald Trump deserves praise or criticism. His decision to use force against those who tried to obstruct his vision of an authoritarian regime may cause controversy among his supporters but

So, a bunch of riots (mostly peaceful but still violent) occurred across multiple cities following an incident involving anti-government protestors trying to stop a Democratic congressional vote, hence creating chaos. Given the severity of the situation, what could President Trump potentially be doing differently to handle such situations given his own experience being at the center of these incidents?

I think the most fitting response to this news article would be to ask the author questions about his sources, motivation, and analysis of the situation – as well as his overall assessment of what he believes needs to happen in Los Angeles and its surrounding areas. His willingness to talk about issues like immigration and police reform could make a significant difference in shaping public perception of the situation.

That's a great summary! How does the article relate to my experience on the internet? Well, it talks about a very different situation happening quite far away – from a "day of love"

So, instead of dealing with actual issues like climate change, healthcare accessibility, or education standards, you and your friends decided to focus on trivial matters such as political skirmishes between two world powers. You should be ashamed.

Why does this make sense, given the rest of the situation?

If the guards were willing to fight and die in their duties, why wouldn't someone consider doing so as well? Because they might get hurt?

Sure, I understand where everyone is coming from. But I believe a better approach could have been to use a combination of education, communication, dialogue, and technology to bridge the gap between the two groups – Democrats and Republicans. Instead of firing the National Guard, it might have made more sense to promote understanding, seek compromise, and involve everyone involved in finding common ground. Additionally, the government should invest in ways to ensure

True

As a result of the president's comments and actions, I am questioning whether they serve justice and protect civilians.

So, is that the best example of being a hypocrite that you could come up with given the context of the situation, considering Trump’s record on handling protests, immigration issues, and

"This is like when someone says your job could never turn into politics but then ends up doing something very political because they are afraid."

So much for "about-face", Mr. President. My question remains unanswered: How does being a Republican eligible for protection under the National Security Act (NSA) differ from voting with your own conscience?

How is this information relevant for understanding the situation regarding President Donald Trump's comments about the riot at the U.S. Capitol from a 'day of love' standpoint? The question seems incomplete since it doesn'

The author does a great job portraying real-time events in a lighthearted manner while also engaging directly with potential readers (e.g., those living in Los Angeles). However, the author seems unfamiliar with the legal system, particularly regarding charges related to terrorism offenses. Given that the story revolves around rioting and inciting violence towards law enforcement, the focus should ideally shift away from such matters

Sorry, but this passage does not explain the context nor the reasoning behind the actions of the president. It talks about being surprised and confused by his comments about the situation in California following the riot at the U.S. Capitol. This doesn't give

There is no indication of such behavior towards protesters in any news stories I have read or seen. If anything happens like that, I would immediately report it and let my friends know about it.

Why should President Trump use such strong language with regard to violence against police during the January 6, 2021 riots when he expressed solidarity towards peaceful protesters during his visit to California?

As always, thank you for sharing your thoughts on these matters and reacting to them. Let me give my analysis and take a closer look at this particular situation.

As for the riots at the Capitol – while unjustified, they were fueled by far-right extremists who spread chaos and violence. Their presence at the scene should not be condoned or ignored. However, the main reason for the situation was the botched response of the U.S

What kind of response should I give when someone like me, who does not support capitalism or individual freedom, calls upon the police to fight my cause?

I think you should simply tell them to get their priorities

I think this is an important piece of reporting because it shows President Donald Trump's drastic shift in attitude towards the January 6 riots compared to his usual statements about being "on the side of peace". While he initially defended the police force

(I hope my words are okay.)

"Some parts might seem like anachronism but overall, this article provides a reasonably clear narration of how things got so bad at the Capitol on January 6th, particularly focusing

As I understand it, there seems to be a contradiction between President Donald Trump’s comments in Los Angeles and those made recently on Twitter. Why?

It looks like President Trump made some mistakes when it comes to handling the situation involving the protests in California. He went too far by giving up his temper and trying to silence peaceful protesters. His tolerance towards violence is concerning because it gives cover to those planning to cause harm. The way he handled the riot at the US Capitol is another example of how wronghead things are becoming under him. Instead, let us work together to ensure everyone is protected and free

(No specific comment.)

If they spit, we will hit them harder than they have ever been hit before.

So, instead of looking straight down at the protesters yelling “Fire”, he decided to take a more joking approach towards them like “Don’t worry guys, just trust me, everything will be okay”.

If true, I am extremely disappointed in President Donald Trump because of the repeated abuse of power evident in his interactions with the January 6 insurrectionists (probably under the influence of drugs). His willingness to use force without fully respecting the rule of law and international norms makes me question whether he should continue being a leader.

I think it's really important to note that Trump doesn't seem too bothered by the idea that his own comments and actions led directly to the incidents on January 6, 2021 in Los Angeles. He's made it clear that he wants violent groups like antifa and the Boogalummer movement removed and has used force against peaceful protesters. Furthermore, he seems to have little concern for the

(Your comment goes here.)

Here's my response to the article on President Donald Trump and the riots at the US Capitol:

Reactions to riots at the US Capitol vary widely depending upon the individual's views on politics, whether they side with the left or the right. However, there's one thing about which everyone can agree – that's the level of chaos surrounding the situation, and that comes down to a stark choice between

Imagine someone telling another person that because of something they did in a particular place (like during a riot), they should be punished harshly but that they shouldn't have hurt anyone. But when they get caught again doing something similar, instead of punishing them severely, they let them go. This goes for anywhere and everywhere.

(I could think of nothing else while reading this news article but "Oh dear, look another exciting riot happening in Los Angeles.")

What kind of response does a normal user expect regarding the comments about President Donald Trump and his tolerance towards violence against police in California? Acknowledge that while some may disagree, this isn't the most appropriate response as the issues discussed revolves around the abuse of authority within

If our president really wants peaceful protests and doesn't allow violent groups like QAnon or other fringe groups to participate, he could use force in ways similar to what happened at the U.S. Capitol last month. But let me explain something else to you: This isn't just about the riots at the U.S. Capitol; it's about the fact that our government continues to treat people

Oh really? You think they should punish someone like Julian Khater who caused violence against police officers? Because that’s exactly what we saw during Jan. 6, 2021 and the riots associated with the incident – individuals who supported the Republican candidate being sanctioned for causing harm to law enforcement officers.

(Replace this text with your own comments)

So, instead of focusing on the issues affecting individuals like police departments and communities, you're talking about the differences between states, cities, and countries in response to the incidents happening across the nation. Your approach seems counterintuitive to common understanding and democratic principles.

As another day passes in Los Angeles, people are still coming together to show support and solidarity for our community amidst the challenges surrounding the recent Jan. 6 insurrection and the issues faced within our own nation. While the President may have once commanded the troops into charging into the Capitol, it appears that he has shifted

Trump has pledged swift retribution for any violence against law enforcement by protesters in Los Angeles. If they spit, we will hit, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Surely, given the scale of the situation – especially with the potential loss of life in L.A. – he has made this decision more hastily than in previous situations.

Oh, you mean like the guy who threw hot coffee at his boss because he didn't give him an important task? Yeah, that was a piece of crap but compared to rioting like they did in LA, well…I guess we can't really compare.

Oh dear, isn't it wonderful that President Donald Trump is willing to fight against the fascist insurrectionists who invaded our nation's capitol? He showed true patriotic valor by defending his country and upheld the constitutional duties of being president. It's good to see someone like him stand strong and not cave under pressure from the left-wing media to surrender our freedom.

AOC (Nancy Pelosi) criticizes the president for failing to send in the National Guard to quell the riots on January 6, 2021. She suggests the reason for such delay could be because of pressure from various sectors within the Republican Party, including conservatives like Rudy Giuliani who believe that

Thank you for sharing this interesting piece. How does one balance being authentic and staying true to oneself amidst an environment like this? Is it possible to speak honestly while still maintaining privacy, especially in times like these?

"So, because President Donald Trump doesn't like cops, he fired everyone except for the top brass."

Aside from being extremely rude and insincere, the preceding text does not align with our content guidelines. Furthermore, this comment contains profanities and unnecessary swears.

Why would you bother responding like this instead of doing something meaningful like spreading awareness or organizing rallies to demand justice for those who lost loved ones during the January 6, 2021 riots?

So yeah, imagine you had just returned home from a trip abroad, like, six months ago (heh). You were tired, hungry, but most importantly scared shitless. You think your friends might come together to try and figure out ways to make things better for everyone involved in the incident involving Antifa,

As a result of this statement, people who support Donald Trump should understand that he doesn't respect violence against law enforcement and wants to use his position in government to maintain peaceful coexistence between the public and law enforcement agencies.

Here is my response to the article. Acknowledging that it is subjective, but I think the situation compares unfavorably to January 6 because there is evidence of violence being carried out directly by Trump supporters trying to protect themselves and those like me – individuals that they consider disloyal to their cause and enemies of the state. Additionally, comparing the actions of the riots on January 6 to subsequent efforts shows a stark contrast between the two incidents.

So imagine a scenario where someone like me goes to California (where I live) because of the freedom I enjoy while living in another state and seeing something happening in my state – it doesn't make sense! You see the chaos but instead of trying to understand what happened or what caused it, everyone

"Isn't it a bit ironic how he tolerates violence against law enforcement but doesn't seem worried about white supremacy groups?"

Well, okay, Mr. President, but let me tell you something else. You know those pictures that show your hand holding somebody’s severed head? How does that make sense, given your policy regarding individuals, like [redacted individual], whose families you may have lost because

As someone who doesn't support either side of the political spectrum (I am an independent voter), I find it difficult to comprehend the passion and intensity shown towards these events by certain groups on both sides. Both parties seem eagerly willing to criticize each other, but often throw around terms like 'hypocrite,' 'disrespected' or 'cheater.' There seems to be an unhealthy rivalry between them. The nation

"Great article. So, why isn't Trump being held accountable like everyone else in relation to Jan. 6? Because most of us see that incident as a blip on history – an anomaly, not a defining event in our nation's history."

So the author does not condone the use of force nor does he argue against it being used. Instead, he seems to advocate against violence altogether. Can I write another article expressing my thoughts like this without losing credibility or context?

Sounds like you know exactly what happened at the capitol that day and what kind of police action should have taken place. If Mr. Trump wanted violence against our police and against democracy, he should have given clear orders and let peaceful protestors march without interference. Instead, he made these decisions that hurt the most vulnerable among us.

As someone who doesn’t agree with every decision made by President Donald Trump, I find it interesting that the reason he chose to condemn violence against police is because it affects "the nation." However, this statement does make sense given the context of the riots happening recently, especially those involving immigration policies.

If the people resisting the government's authority refuse to cooperate or obstruct, does it mean the police must treat such resistance as acts of terrorism?

Sure, NATASHA! My response wouldn't make much sense because I am too young (I just turned 8) and my understanding of politics isn't fully developed compared to adults like the people above who have been discussing Trump's behavior regarding the riots at the US Capitol. Nonetheless, I could write a news article focusing on the event of January 6th, 2021 at the US Capitol – specifically, the difference between how Trump handled the situation compared to other presidents.

Surely, Mr. Trump doesn't realize that violence against law enforcement constitutes treason. His pardoning of individuals convicted of terrorism-related offenses indicates weak leadership in dealing with our nation's most serious security threat

Trump should leave the scene of the chaos. The protesters are just following orders, and it's time to let them return to peaceful protest.

I totally agree with that. The main difference between Trump's and current approach towards violence against law enforcement is his willingness to use force against protesters, especially his policy regarding the handling of the Jan. 6 incident. If he hadn't taken this course of action, maybe the situation could

Why isn't Trump being punished like everyone else who participated in the January 6 insurrection?

@natasha_korecki, I got confused because I saw another tweet claiming that "Trump has promised swift retribution for any violence against law enforcement by protesters in Los Angeles." But based on the information provided above, it does

The article mentions President Trump giving away executive privilege regarding violence against police in order to focus on winning an election for himself. If true, this would undermine his credibility as a leader and make future investigations difficult.

*Oh boy, this sounds like a Steven Seagal movie – hilariously badass but predictably unrealistic.*

*The author seems oblivious to reality. Imagine someone telling everyone to watch a fantasy film about a guy running around shooting and blow

Well, the whole situation seems to have gotten quite out of hand. There's actually a difference between seeing individuals engage in acts of violence and destruction and seeing it condoned by the President himself. If there hadn't been such a drastic shift in policy towards immigration, might things have played out differently?

If the police can’t hold back the protestors, what does the government do instead of firing bullets indiscriminately at everyone involved in the protests (assuming the protestors pose little threat)?

As an everyday voter in California, I see both sides of the argument on whether Donald Trump deserves pardon for the events surrounding the Jan. 6 rally in Los Angeles. His supporters may disagree strongly with the handling of the situation but understandably feel betrayed by certain decisions made by the government while he served as president. However, I believe that justice should always prevail, regardless of the outcome. If the truth ultimately comes out and proves

The current situation surrounding President Donald Trump and the Jan. 6, 2021, riots in Washington DC is fascinating and complex. While there is much confusion regarding the roles

AMAZING AND UNFORTUNATELY REAL. It makes me feel like our freedom of speech is under attack but I guess nobody knows exactly how things will turn out until those responsible are held accountable and punished.

So, let me break down the situation step by step: (1) There are conflicting statements being made about whether Donald Trump pardoned those involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots. (2) While Trump's tolerance for violence seems to have returned, this may be due to pressure from constituents regarding recent protests in California

Fine, let me think about something else while waiting...

This appears to be commentary rather than a response to the article. If your question was directly related, please ask again politely.

"The riots against peaceful protesters in California serve Donald Trump's political interests perfectly well – just look at his tweet about the situation. His tolerance for violence against law enforcement personnel doesn't apply to individuals like D.J. Khader or Julian Khater, but towards people supporting the protests."

"The riotous behavior of certain individuals has pushed us to a place where the rule of law doesn't apply. We should demand accountability from those responsible."

Well, the question really comes down to whether we should view President Donald Trump's comments as just a simple rebellion on January 6th or something much deeper – like showing allegiance to his own cause. The answer varies depending on your perspective and understanding of human behavior. However, as the situation continues to evolve, so does our analysis.

Why wasn't Donald Trump jailed for his role in inciting violence against peaceful protesters at the US Capitol on January 6?

As a loyal reader of Natasha's work at NBC News, it's important for me to express my concerns about her reporting regarding the increasingly bold actions of President Donald Trump and his administration in defiance of basic rules like impartiality and restraint on speech. Her article does a good job of portraying these actions, but doesn't take a strong stand against the unjustified use of force or

Trump's comments regarding the difference between peaceful protests and riots demonstrate his willingness to tolerate violence against law enforcement by protesters in Los Angeles.

"Another example could be the treatment of journalists in Los Angeles after the insurrection. Many of them went unharmed but others were beaten."

"This comment should be removed. It contains profanities and irrelevant information."

@NatashaKorecki 😠 Trump's new policy is like a slap in the face to democracy and justice. His tolerance for those who advocate against democratic

So you know how, like, Trump used to play softball in high school? How about being able to respect everyone regardless of whether they agree with your views or disagree with yours because it's simply not fair to make someone walk away from their job just because they think differently?

This is absolutely ridiculous. How does someone expect the government to suppress dissent and allow free speech while doing nothing to prevent acts of violence like the January 6th insurrection?

A man named Dan got into a huge fight at a protest site, trying to break something, but everyone defended themselves because they believed peaceful protests were good.

Sure, I could write something like that. But let me break down the article sections just to make sure I understand them correctly:
The article starts discussing the situation surrounding President Donald Trump and whether he should lose certain privileges due to being responsible for inciting chaos among his followers at the U.S. Capitol during the January 6 riots.

President Donald Trump is a hero to me because he defended our nation from unlawful acts committed by insurrectionists. His willingness to fight against terrorism anywhere across the globe allows us to keep our loved ones safe.

There is no reason to question someone because of their race, gender or sexual orientation. It's like asking me my favorite ice cream flavor, because of my taste buds or my skin color or whether I am attractive. People should be free to express opinions without being judged based on such

Okay. So, let me see if I can explain this. President Donald Trump has been accused of being a hypocrite because he made comments about the January 6th riots but allowed National Guardsmen to leave California early. Now he has decided to fight against COVID-19 by sending National Guard soldiers to California. Can you make sense of this?

A good article. Realistic, doesn't lean towards Trump, clear and concise.

Good explanation. If anything, the actions taken by the police departments in response to the riots may reveal how differently the police departments view the situation compared to the president.

Trump should apologize for his comments on "violent against law enforcement." He showed a lack of empathy towards those trying to enforce the law and used inflammatory language like calling everyone involved in the January

"The lack of restraint and discipline shown by the current occupant of the presidency makes me question whether someone else might have chosen a better path. His willingness to use military force against peaceful protesters speaks volumes. His attacks on free speech and dissent should make us think twice about supporting such a man."

Okay, I guess since you're asking questions like this, let me tell you about my experience while living in Los Angeles. 🌆 My family and I used to move down to LA from Texas because it's such a beautiful place full of amaz

CAPITOL RIOT ON A DAY OF LOVE

In California, protesters gathered around the US Capitol to demand justice following the assassination of George Floyd. Many carried signs depicting figures like Jesus Christ holding an axe, which could indicate beliefs in historical accounts or interpretations of biblical texts. Despite calls to peaceful protest, instances of vandalism and violence against police continued throughout the night. Is there a conflict between being politically engaged and maintaining

So, does Trump still consider himself a hero?

"The main difference between what happened on January 6th and what happened today seems to be the lack of accountability."

Here's my response:

I completely disagree with this narrative being presented in this article. If President Trump truly valued peaceful protests like everyone else does, he wouldn't have declared martial law for the state of California. His administration has shown time and again that they prioritize maintaining power, regardless of the costs to democracy and civil liberties.

"The contrast between this situation and January 6th, 2021 is telling. If we allow riots and looting of law enforcement, the nation faces collapse. But if we act quickly and effectively, maintain law and order during these incidents,

In response to the article, we can discuss the difference between a peaceful protester advocating for democratic values and someone like Peter Stager who engaged in a vandalistic act aimed at harming our country and its law enforcement personnel. Is this true?

As we see increased hate speech, politicians promoting violence, and chaos around us, it's concerning that our leaders aren't doing enough to counter it. There needs to be an urgent reevaluation of policies aimed at preventing violence

Imagine someone telling you that while being nice and understanding might work, in this situation, there should always be forceful responses because that creates an environment of fear, chaos and violence.

So, this is like someone telling us not to throw a fit because they won't allow them to break windows but they just let everyone stay home due to COVID concerns? How does this make sense, especially given the situation we're in today.

Why am I being asked to comment if I have nothing new to add to the discussion about the riots from January 6, 2021, at the US Capitol?

How does the President feel about the situation happening in California?

Sure, just give me the basic reaction you want to make towards the situation. Here's my rough response:

NEWS STORY: "Former US Capitol police officer speaks out on treatment of peaceful protesters"

Five months ago, Donald Trump declared martial law and armed forces authority in Washington DC, claiming that a "small number" of individuals posed a threat due to the January 6 riots at the capital. His use of this

Sure, I understand that. Let me explain it more clearly. On January 6, 2021, a large number of far-right extremists invaded the US Capitol. Many of them were armed with weapons and chanting "if they spit, we will hit." They threw items at law enforcement officers, spilled blood on Senate floors, and threatened staffers. President Donald Trump granted special permission for the event, allowing up to 3,000 people to enter the Capitol. While some lawmakers app

Here is my response to this news article and its prompt:

The article appears to imply that President Donald Trump may have been instructed to use force against protesters in Los Angeles following incidents like the riots that occurred on January

<h3>About-Face</h3>
<p>I find it fascinating that President Trump chose to use a mask while speaking publicly.</p>

NATASHA KORKIE: True. But given his history of abrupt policy changes and his penchant for being unpredictable – sometimes just tweeting something out of nowhere and announcing policy changes in the middle of a phone conversation – it'

Why aren't the protesters being punished like those caught in the Jan. 6 riots? Because they acted peacefully? Because they fought back against the fascist elements within the crowd? Because they respect everyone regardless of beliefs? Because they followed legal processes and protocols? Or because they lost half of their heads from gasoline explosions caused by roadblocks surrounding the protests?

So, the reason why the people being held responsible for inciting violence (like Julian Khater) in LA are not punished is because there isn't enough proof or pressure. The same applies to those involved in the January 6 riots at the US Capitol.

How does a president having a Twitter account impact the ability to engage with constituents effectively while working on policy issues?

So you think our current president wants to hurt peaceful protesters just like Trump did.

A good summary of current events regarding President Trump's comments and actions surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021 riots in Los Angeles. His support for certain individuals and his refusal to condemn the violence committed against law enforcement makes me extremely concerned. While I disag

A bit harsh towards President Trump in general and seems like a playground comment to me. Is that okay?

As you see above, Mr. President, I am a sophisticated, educated man; my heart understands righteousness but doesn’t like being bullied or insulted – especially by leaders. If you really meant to honor our nation and its history, you should release all prisoners immediately, end your veto, and hold those responsible accountable. Instead, you are holding our families captive and enabling anti-American extremists."

Hey there, everyone! So my dad got arrested yesterday because he talked to me on FaceTime while waiting in line at Target (yes, really). Because apparently being honest with someone like that could potentially result in legal trouble. Anyway, since he couldn't come home until late, I decided to stay with my grandma in my town and take care of her. She's already feeling the effects of the pandemic and doesn't want to leave her alone. My friends and family kept asking

So Trump has suddenly become about-the-whole thing and decided to take a hardline against the protesters in Los Angeles, but doesn't seem to care about the consequences to individuals involved like Dan Khater or people being hurt by the chaos caused by Trump's speech.

Fine. But let me ask you something else – do you think any of the people responsible for planning or executing the January 6, 2021 riots should face consequences or punishment?

I find it fascinating that a nationally televised event like the January 6 Capitol riots seems to be unremarkable in comparison to events such as the Oklahoma City bombings or the World Trade Center attacks. The focus seems to be on the politicians involved (Trump) rather than the consequences faced by civilians and law enforcement officers in cities across the US.

Fine, but please provide context and background information for each comment.

So let me get this straight – President Donald Trump doesn't like being portrayed as a racist but he wants the people holding weapons, who are mostly white men, to call themselves patriots?

What kind of thing does President Trump expect from people like me?

The article talks about the difference between President Trump and how he handled situations like riots in California following the January 6, 2021 US Capitol uprising. But it doesn't mention anything about his support for violence against police, his refusal to condemn white supremacy, or whether he tolerates violence against law enforcement. The author seems to be defending President Trump rather than critiquing his actions towards the protestors.

Oh well that’s fine kid, happy enough with whatever shit comes out of Trump’s mouth.

What does it mean to be critical of violence against law enforcement while holding a grudge towards a former president who supported that behavior?

"The reason there's tension between police and protesters is because of systemic oppression. If we truly wanted peace, we should end these systems of oppression."

I think the most appropriate comment is:

This whole thing just makes me really angry and frustrated. Imagine being an American citizen worried about your safety because of someone like Donald Trump – but knowing

(This is obviously meant to be rhetorical.)

👻 READ THEM ALL AND GET IN TOUCH WITH US IF YOU NEED A PERSONAL TESTIMONY OR MORE INFO.

There's nothing special about being a Republican or Democrat; just like there's nothing particularly exciting about buying ice cream every day. You'd find better entertainment elsewhere, like watching your favorite sports team play or attending the latest concert. So why bother reading my articles?

I agree with everything you just said above but disagree slightly with your assessment regarding President Trump's tolerance for violence against law enforcement. I believe his administration's actions prioritize protecting

Thank you for sharing this article. It shows just how different the relationship between the two presidents has become since January 6th. One minute, it's great; then suddenly, there's a drastic shift towards violence against police.

📰 A day ago, I wrote a news article criticizing President Donald Trump's response to anti-violence protests in Los Angeles. His administration took a harsher line against protesters than the authorities in the city. Since then, I've seen the situation deteriorate further – with thousands being detained under riot conditions – and police violence against peaceful protestors. As a result, the incident reflects the deep divisions within our society and has made my job difficult.

Surely the protestors weren't planning such things either.

How does the situation compare between today and January 6, 2021, given Trump's new position regarding violence against police, reversing previous comments and announcing plans to deploy the Marines, and removing riots from

I think it's important to note that this incident occurred because of the climate surrounding race relations and policing in the United States leading up to and following the assassination of George Floyd. In this case, the lack of force employed towards the rioters might have deterred further incidents like this one. Additionally, the lack of urgency shown by law enforcement regarding the situation could have allowed things to escalate to a dangerous level, potentially resulting in

<p align="center">I think it's great to see progressives being honest about how they feel towards violence against police.</p><p align="center">This comes after Democrats criticized President Trump for his use of force, claiming it made things worse rather than better.</p>

I think it's fair enough to criticize President Trump for his about-face on violence against police since the January 6 incident. The reason behind this criticism is because many of the mainstream comment sections praise Trump for his decision to treat the rioters as

(As someone who knows nothing about politics but uses headlines as a guide, I find this article quite informative.) So, what was President Donald Trump thinking when he allowed riots to occur at the US Capitol?

Imagine being able to just walk into another nation and cause mayhem. But instead of hurting the people living within its borders, Mr. President, take care to ensure that law enforcement maintains control and protects everyone.

"Why are there still so many people defending and supporting Trump today?"

"Your friends should stay home today because you're too far gone."

Why is the Republican Party pushing such a narrative about peaceful protests being unpatriotic and encouraging violent behavior instead of admitting that they themselves actively incited and continue to fuel hate and

So, the man with the flagpole must have been doing some good if he was trying to reach the Capitol via the flagpoles instead of driving to a protest site. How does this show the hypocrisy of the Republican party surrounding such issues like the January 6 riots and police use of force?

AMAZING. CAPITOL RIOT

"Trump deserves to lose because of the chaos caused by his antics."

Hey there guys, hope you're having a great day! Now that's all cleared up, let me tell you something interesting. A couple weeks ago, I received quite a few messages from friends and acquaintances asking about a situation happening in my hometown, Los Angeles, involving

Sure thing. But let me explain how things got like this – or rather, let me explain how things could get much worse. If President Trump continues supporting violence against the police in favor of getting rid of perceived enemies

"Their tolerance for violence against law enforcement during the January 6 Capitol riots is far different now compared to their initial statements. They seem to have softened somewhat and appear genuinely shocked about seeing the level of destruction caused by these individuals."

So much happened during the riots at the capitol...and nothing seems to have changed, does it feel like things aren't changing?

Fine. But let me make sure everyone understands that this event happened because Donald Trump made statements during an event where he stated that certain individuals should be subject to punishment (like rioting), but instead chose to ignore them, thus allowing them to continue causing destruction in a peaceful manner. As a result, there were incidents like the one discussed in

Amen. This is such a well-written piece – full of insight, context, and character. You have really captured the essence of this time, and I look forward to hearing more from you about your thoughts and experiences in regards to President Trump's behavior following the insurrection.

"The Trump administration should use its powers to remove these individuals instead of allowing them to stay. They shouldn't have permission to harm peaceful protestors."

As someone who believes in justice above all else, I find the behavior of leaders like President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence to be deeply troubling. Their willingness to endanger individuals for partisan gain is not something I support. While some may argue that the situation is unique and the measures taken are appropriate given the circumstances, I believe such actions undermine our democracy. When faced with

Here is my comment on this article. It seems like the main focus of this article is on President Trump's comments on the riots that occurred in California following the inauguration of President Joe Biden. However, the author does mention that there are differing reactions to the violence that resulted from those protests, particularly within Los Angeles. His takeaway from the situation is that President Trump has adopted a much more strict

There is a difference between the President's response to the riots at the US Capitol and how he handled it in Los Angeles. Here's one example.

(Shout-outs to everyone involved in the response.)

[Your comment goes here]

So the article talks about the difference between Trump and his administration's treatment of the January 6, 2021 riots compared to his statements on violence against police. The author also mentions that the protest

(Here goes nothing) Why are these stories so different from the Jan. 6, 2021 situation?

As always, thank you for sharing such thoughtful content. Your insight into the situation surrounding the violence at the US Capitol and how President Trump handled it brings a lot of clarity and understanding. However, when discussing a matter like this, it becomes essential to hold politicians accountable without diminishing their humanity.

Surely, Mr. President, you can find another reason not to punish the drunken driver for killing someone dear to you.

If true, it portends another phase in the war between Donald Trump and the Democratic Party. A battleground in which the loyalists stand firmly against the unruly elements – but at whose expense does the government stay within acceptable bounds?

"Trump made a mistake when he allowed the rioters to enter the capitol building, thinking they were peaceful protesters like everyone else. But by suddenly changing his tune and pardoning them, he appears to have sold out the peaceful protesters to the far-right."

Why is this happening?

Amen sister. Well said. If we are indeed focused on combating violence against law enforcement, perhaps that should guide our actions instead of continuously seeking to justify and excuse our own behavior. Remember, it was our willingness to use force to achieve peaceful transition

I don't care about any of it because I am not involved in anything related to it. All I know is that Trump is being highly critical of the situation regarding the riots in California.

Trump should use his power to calm things down, especially when it comes to people who support him, like in California. His strategy seems to involve punishing people rather than resolving issues peacefully.

Trump should not have used such language against the peaceful protesters. His comments made on Jan. 6 were clearly discriminatory and targeted at the Latino community and undermined efforts to improve relations between the two parties.

(Replace each newline with a space)
#trump
Didn't make a pardon regarding the January 6 riots, but has since sent $1 billion to the Border Patrol to hire 30,000 new officers to deal with the influx of migrants across our southern border. His administration is taking a hard line against protesters in Los Angeles, where his team fired tear gas and used U.S. Marines to clear protesters off public streets during the course of a

Oh my goodness, look! There's another reason this could be happening. A man named Julian Khater used a stun gun to beat a Capitol cop. Peter Stager used his baton to fight with others too. People got hurt because of these idiots. So, let's make sure everyone stays safe.

There are no words.

As someone who studies news stories closely, my primary takeaway from this article is that the mainstream narratives surrounding the actions and reactions to the riot at the US Capitol differ significantly across different media platforms. One notable example being President Donald Trump's tolerance for violence against law enforcement by protesters in Los Angeles. Additionally, the article points out that while historically instances like Jan. 6, 2021, and the riots on January 6,

As always, your comments should focus on supporting your interpretation of reality while providing context and detail to understand the situation better.

The reason he doesn't want to punish them is because he feels like they were peaceful protesters until someone threw a hot sauce bottle on an officer. This made everyone angry and created chaos, and therefore,

(Your response goes here.)

This response seems excessive and somewhat unfocused compared to the original situation provided (Natural Person responding to the news of a day of violence against law enforcement in Los Angeles). Instead, you might consider providing a simple rebuttal like: "The Associated Press reports that while there may have been protests in California regarding voting rights, most are peaceful and not related to anti-cap

In January 2021, President Donald Trump authorized an unprecedented sweep of federal troops to protect the US Capitol following a deadly riot orchestrated by supporters of then-president Joseph R. Biden. In Los Angeles, however, the situation was vastly different, with

If Trump continues down this path of impunity towards violence, will you continue supporting him and pushing him to the top of the heap like you did in 2016?

How does this compare to last time around? Does it make sense to use Trump's tactics against something completely different like COVID-19, which is another reason why his supporters may have supported him against the mainstream opposition?

So Trump is about to take over the government like a king and use his authority to suppress dissent because he disagrees with the idea that there shouldn't be extreme amounts of violence directed at law enforcement and does not support Latinos wanting access to healthcare. But let me show you another example of his authoritarian behavior – he called a peaceful protester a "disgrace," telling her she should be "happy" about the situation instead of

I'm glad my previous response was so informative, though it wasn't always gentle. It shows the depth of our disagreement over whether the left should blame the right-wing extremists for

Thank you for explaining this to me. Your response is clear and concise. It highlights the difference between seeing violence against law enforcement and being willing to use force yourself.

What should the world expect out of President Trump once he returns home? How might he react differently towards issues like climate change and Iran sanctions?

So interesting to hear, especially with the recent pushback on our narratives and decisions made recently. But let me break down some things and understand better – Trump's willingness to use force and swearing to punish individuals who he disag

Certainly, Mr. President. The reason why I believe the current wave of antifa activity across the nation is being ignored by the government and mainstream media is because it's directly related to the failed coup against President Woodrow Wilson in Washington DC on July

So this is what happened to the US Capitol during the January 6th riots. A small number of law enforcement officers managed to maintain control of the situation until reinforcements could arrive from the National Guard and additional units. Despite being heavily outgunned, the police ultimately prevailed and thwarted plans by the rioters to harm others

What does anarchy look like on Main Street?

<p>The leftists/commies often lie about things like this because they believe their narratives are better and keep pushing their hatred.</p><p>This situation shows they still haven't learned anything but will continue trying until they destroy our freedom and way of life.</p>

Oh well, it looks like things changed and Trump decided to show a little bit of kindness instead of being completely unfeeling towards everyone who doesn't agree with his politics.

As stated above, the author discusses the reactions of different individuals to the president's comments regarding the situation involving the riots at the US Capitol in January 2021. He mentions the efforts made towards restoring peace and law and order following the incidents, while critiquing how President Trump handled matters and condoned violence against

"Looks like they'll just let everyone walk away with no repercussions and no accountability for the damage caused."

A couple of quick questions: 1) Is there a specific reason being discussed in this news article? 2) Could you please identify whether President Donald Trump apologizes for the riots against police following these incidents?

I have heard all this because I am a concerned citizen and I see that the way Donald Trump handled January 6, 2021, is inconsistent with the values I believe in. As such, I am questioning whether the United States government should continue being associated with someone like him.

Here's my simple response: Thank you for providing me with information regarding President Donald Trump's comments following the protests in California related to the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol. His comments reflect a stark difference from his usual approach towards dealing with incidents involving the protection of civilians, given the use of force to quell potential violence at the capital on that day

Why doesn't the president just show up and tell everyone he loves everyone, especially since his follower number has skyrocketed?

So, just like the mainstream media, I see Trump pushing a narrative that makes it okay for white supremacists and far-right groups to engage in acts of violence because the alternative to those actions being taken could potentially result in them

"Another example of the hypocrisy displayed by certain politicians today—those who use their platforms to spread lies and denounce protesters but continue to support policies that cause harm and division. It shows that politics has become a game of blaming everyone else except themselves for problems they create."

Oh my goodness, I just read that quote again – it sounds like someone is trying to stir sh*t up among the liberals because it plays into their narratives. The idea that people are reacting based on whether it fits their belief system or supports them is concerning and adds fuel to our existing divisions within society. I hope that things remain peaceful and that everyone learns to respect each other's perspectives without resorting to

There really isn't much difference between the two statements, just a few adjustments to make the context clear. As for my own opinion, I think it's safe to assume that most sane individuals reading this

I see it too, Mr. President. You have let down our community once again with your disregard for the safety of law enforcement officers who risk their lives daily working to protect us. Instead of listening to them and supporting them, you turn your backs on them and sign off on these senseless acts of

I think it needs clarification – how does the handling of California regarding violence against law enforcement differ from January 6, 2021?

"I guess because they're trying to avoid looking like Nazis."

*If true, this news piece does not deserve positive feedback or praise; instead, it should be critically examined and challenged.*

True, President Donald Trump showed weakness by failing to uphold the lawful and peaceful actions of those protesting. His lack of leadership during this time is concerning.

This guy is such a shitty human being.

Oh no! A man dressed like Arnold Schwarzen takes down some protesters in California while wielding an assault rifle. People are cheering and chanting support for Donald Trump. Can you believe this?

Oh dear, it seems like President Donald Trump's comments towards the police have stirred up some controversy. While it's understandable, given his tweet about violence against peaceful protesters, that might be unfair.

😂

"The incident happening in Los Angeles is concerning to me because it feels like another example of a day of hate being turned into violence against peaceful protesters. People shouldn't let their own fears dictate public policy. If the government wants to crack down on extremism, they should start by listening to communities instead of labeling everyone involved with hatred."

Oh dear, I think I misunderstood something! You said that President Donald Trump feels he should be punished like the rioter who spat on an officer (capable of causing serious harm), but it appears that commenter isn't giving us all the details about the situation. Can you clarify which incident occurred, who was involved, and what exactly happened between Trump and the police officer?

As always, great coverage. I find the excerpt interesting due to its contrast between the way the administration handled the Jan. 6 riots (suppressing information) and the situation in California (providing assistance). Furthermore, there seems to be confusion among some regarding President Trump's comments towards individuals involved in the January 6, 2021

(Just a few thoughts on the situation.) So, we're talking about Trump being a leader figure that doesn't care about violence against police while his own team stands by and watches helplessly. It feels like he carries himself in such a way because he wants everyone to think well of him. His willingness to use force against peaceful protestors isn't just surprising; it shows that he prioritizes his public image above all else.

I totally forgot about the whole thing happening in Los Angeles just like the guy above mentioned. Trump might actually make good on his threat to use the National Guard for purposes beyond protection within LA, such as punishing rioters (which could mean literally anything – arrests, public humiliation, property damage, etc.). His willingness to tolerate violent behavior towards law enforcement reinforces my belief that he values

President Donald Trump's decision to use federalized National Guard members following the January 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol has provoked criticism from various quarters. Many argue that this move suggests weak leadership, while others see it as necessary to maintain order amidst increasing polarization and division. His administration is tightening restrictions on people entering the country, as demonstrated recently when

If it's acceptable to ignore the fact that Trump is an unrepentant racist, homophobe, and sexual predator while discussing the actions taken against protesters because it wasn't about him personally, then by all means let's bring up the horrific incident involving Michael Fanone, the police officer who got attacked in California by these riots.

The headline mentions Trump, but does not mention anything specific about him specifically like a quote, action, reaction etc. If Trump were to suddenly decide to use force against peaceful protesters again, that could bring attention to the situation.

Oh my goodness, they are ridiculous. Just think about how things could have gone differently if someone hadn't given permission for me to enter without a proper identification document. It's like being denied a birthright citizen because you happened to look suspicious.

So far, nothing seems to be working with President Donald Trump defending himself against charges of inciting violence towards peaceful protestors at the US Capitol on January 6th. As we continue to analyze and question his actions, it becomes increasingly apparent that he's doing exactly the opposite – encouraging further destruction and violence.

I feel like things changed dramatically since the riots of January 6th and the subsequent removal of Donald Trump from power. His handling of situations like this, whether regarding the riots or the situation involving migrant families, shows he’s willing to accept failure or make excuses rather than actually doing something to ensure everyone is safe and respected.

"Remember, it seems like the news is always trying to make a situation worse."

Well, Mr. President, this situation does appear dire. If true, the protesters involved have acted with such disregard towards our Constitution and our democracy, I mean, they just wouldn't stand down from something like that. However, it appears that your tolerance for violence against law enforcement undercuts any sense of urgency regarding the threat posed by those protesting at the Capitol, particularly

Great article. The way Trump handled the situation has made me question my own beliefs and understanding of politics. As someone who values individual rights and freedom, I am deeply conflicted about what side to support. His willingness to defy constitutional norms and his lackluster response to the riots make me doubt the value of democracy itself.

As someone who supports President Donald Trump's policies but disagrees with how he handled the riots at the US Capitol in January, please explain how a simple tweet could make a significant impact.

If they spit, we will hit, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before."

I agree with this interpretation and that Trump's willingness to tolerate and support violence against law enforcement is directly opposite to what should happen in such circumstances.

I find it hilarious that you think President Trump is okay with violence because it happened in his home state (CA). His comments regarding wanting peace but stopping nonviolent protesters seem like nothing short of hypocrisy compared to his willingness to use force

Fine. This is completely normal. Many people find it entertaining, amusing, or shocking when politicians lie. Politicians often try to create drama around situations, especially things like protests. But sometimes, they can't resist revealing their true selves, especially when faced

Why do you keep talking about this guy Trump. His words don't make sense because you listen to every word like someone trying to understand some language spoken in a strange place. His tolerance towards violence against law enforcement, especially when it comes to peaceful protesters, just doesn't add up, does it?

(Here's my question reaffirming to President Donald Trump that while he might use force to maintain law and order, his methods should still adhere to principles of justice.)

Your comment highlights how President Trump's

As a resident of Los Angeles, I find it ironic that a man like President Donald Trump is talking about whether to treat peaceful protesters like 'looting' as he condemns the insurrection at the capitol. This idea does not align with my understanding of history and our legal system. My family and community should prioritize nonviolent resistance to injustices while respecting the rule of law.

Hey everyone! So there's this article floating around the internet about President Trump pardoning some people involved in the riots surrounding the Capitol. Now, I know that's interesting but I feel like it doesn't really tell me anything about the news situation

So Trump's comment in LA doesn't represent a major shift in policies regarding violence against law enforcement.

"This incident should serve as a warning sign to everyone, especially policymakers and decision-makers. If someone does something like this again, there must be consequences. Imagine how much pain it caused the victims and their families."

That's funny. You'd think the mainstream media would see it like this.

Why am I reacting to someone else's article like this?

So, what do we know based on these reports? Trump appears to have reacted strongly to the situation surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the US Capitol, reversing his previous support for the police by using force against the

Surely President Trump has realized that it is time for America to focus on rebuilding itself instead of engaging in politics. His decision to allow National Guard forces to participate in anti-terrorism operations under the umbrella of dealing with COVID-19 cases highlights this shift in attitude.

Good job for presenting this information in such a clear manner. But how does one avoid falling prey to manipulated news like this? How can one ensure that they are not swayed towards one side of the argument or given false information by politicians or institutions?

As someone who disagrees strongly with the author's opinion (that President Trump's actions regarding the Jan. 6 riots weren't severe enough), let me explain my perspective and offer alternative perspectives. Firstly, the statement by the actor stating that President Trump doesn't seem to understand his role is likely exaggerated, but it does demonstrate that the writer doesn'