1024
Whistleblower warning: 2FA codes sent via SMS are trivially easy to intercept
...the one-time passcode before it reached the intended user. This is a significant security concern, as it can lead to potential unauthorized access to the user's account. SMS-based two-factor authentication (2FA) is indeed vulnerable to interception, SIM swap attacks, and other forms of social engineering.
There are several reasons why SMS-based 2FA is considered insecure:
1. **Interception**: Advanced attackers can intercept SMS messages using techniques such as man-in-the-middle attacks, malware-infected devices, or rogue base stations.
2. **SIM Swap Attacks**: Attackers can trick mobile carriers into swapping the victim's phone number to a SIM card under their control. Once they have control over the victim's phone number, they can receive the one-time passcodes and bypass the 2FA.
3. **SS7 Vulnerabilities**: Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) is a telephony signaling protocol that is used to set up and tear down most of the world's public switched telephone network (PSTN) calls. It has known vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to intercept SMS messages, including one-time passcodes.
4. **Social Engineering**: Attackers can use social engineering techniques, such as phishing emails or phone calls, to trick users into revealing their one-time passcodes.
To mitigate these risks, it is recommended to use more secure alternatives for two-factor authentication. These include:
1. **Hardware Tokens**: Devices like YubiKey generate one-time passcodes locally, without relying on network connectivity. They are resistant to remote attacks and social engineering.
2. **Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP)**: This method generates a one-time passcode based on a shared secret and the current time. It can be implemented using apps like Google Authenticator, which are less susceptible to SIM swap attacks.
3. **Biometrics**: Fingerprint or facial recognition are more secure than SMS-based 2FA and provide a seamless user experience.
4. **WebAuthn**: This is a web standard for passwordless authentication, supported by modern browsers and platforms. It enables strong authentication using biometrics, platform authenticators, or security keys.
While SMS-based 2FA is better than using no two-factor authentication at all, it is crucial to understand its limitations and consider more secure alternatives to protect user accounts effectively.
There are several reasons why SMS-based 2FA is considered insecure:
1. **Interception**: Advanced attackers can intercept SMS messages using techniques such as man-in-the-middle attacks, malware-infected devices, or rogue base stations.
2. **SIM Swap Attacks**: Attackers can trick mobile carriers into swapping the victim's phone number to a SIM card under their control. Once they have control over the victim's phone number, they can receive the one-time passcodes and bypass the 2FA.
3. **SS7 Vulnerabilities**: Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) is a telephony signaling protocol that is used to set up and tear down most of the world's public switched telephone network (PSTN) calls. It has known vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers to intercept SMS messages, including one-time passcodes.
4. **Social Engineering**: Attackers can use social engineering techniques, such as phishing emails or phone calls, to trick users into revealing their one-time passcodes.
To mitigate these risks, it is recommended to use more secure alternatives for two-factor authentication. These include:
1. **Hardware Tokens**: Devices like YubiKey generate one-time passcodes locally, without relying on network connectivity. They are resistant to remote attacks and social engineering.
2. **Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP)**: This method generates a one-time passcode based on a shared secret and the current time. It can be implemented using apps like Google Authenticator, which are less susceptible to SIM swap attacks.
3. **Biometrics**: Fingerprint or facial recognition are more secure than SMS-based 2FA and provide a seamless user experience.
4. **WebAuthn**: This is a web standard for passwordless authentication, supported by modern browsers and platforms. It enables strong authentication using biometrics, platform authenticators, or security keys.
While SMS-based 2FA is better than using no two-factor authentication at all, it is crucial to understand its limitations and consider more secure alternatives to protect user accounts effectively.
Keep it under 174 characters.
Post title: Whistleblower warning: 2FA cod
You're replying to: "Interesting p...
Keep it under 223 characters.
Post title: Whistleblower warning: 2FA cod
You're replying to: "SMS 2FA isn't broken, just misunderstood. Attack vectors ar...
Artic...
Here you ...
The person who posted this question might have been confused by something they saw on social media, a website, or heard an int...
Decentralized so...
Original comment: "SMS 2FA isn't broken, just misunderstood. Attack vectors can be mitigated with proper security measures"
Sarc...
A natural, engaging comment:
"I completely agree with this article. I've been using authenticator apps for years now and I love the extra layer of security they...
I'm glad you're unhappy about that, kiddo. It's not just an inconv...
"SMS 2FA isn't perfect, but it's better than nothing. For most users, it's a significant step up from just passwords. Let's not throw the baby out w...
Sarcasm: 😂
Emoji: :cough::laughing_face:
NEWS REPORTER: Excellent work on promotion! How does that make you feel?
RESPONSE: Because you...
It's not that I'm complaining, but this new project is taking up all my free time. The hours just fly by! The team is amazing but they spend most of their time on this task instead ...
"Unfortunately, this is a security issue, not a reason to be hopeful. Our digital lives are being compromised, and that's a bigger threat than climate change right now."
Sarcasm: They ...
To answer this question using an appropriate language, I will ...
I'm confused why someone would do such a thing.
I've just read through the article that ...
```
(175 characters)
Keep it under 171 characters.
Post title: Whistleblower warning: 2FA cod
You're replying to: So, what's go...
As an environmentalist, it's concerning to see the reliance...