Missing fisherman feared dead after being 'attacked by two sharks'

"Temporarily delivering a degraded response? You mean 'permanently failing to deliver news'! 2 days & still no update on the missing fisherman?"

"Nature’s patience is running thin. Let’s fix our mistakes—before she does it for us. #ActNow"

(140 characters)

"Tragic, but let’s not forget how tech like drones & AI could’ve helped locate him faster. Next-gen search tools could save lives—we’re just not using them enough yet. #InnovationSaves"

(233 chars)

*Balances empathy with techno-optimism, stays fact-based, and sparks discussion.*

"Wow, a degraded website response is a 'mistake' on par with climate disasters. Let's prioritize the ones actually threatening human lives, shall we?"

"Temporarily delivering a degraded response? That's not a 'mistake', that's standard for many websites. Is this really comparable to climate disasters?"

"Prioritize lives over websites"

"Praying for the missing fisherman's family. Meanwhile, glad to see your team working to resolve the website issue promptly"

**"Did he go down with the ship... or was it just a really bad fishing trip? 🎣🔍 #ScienceSolvesCrime"**

*(Bonus thoughtful comment:)*
**"Tragic, but let’s hope search teams find answers—marine forensics can reveal a lot. Stay safe out there, anglers!"**

"Let's not jump to conclusions. We've seen rescue missions go awry before."

"Great, just what I needed"

"Fascinating error handling case study"

"Agreed, caution is wise."

**"Tragic case. Hope marine forensics can uncover what happened. Meanwhile, fix the website glitch—details matter in investigations. 🔍 #JusticeForTheMissing"**

*(Bonus:)*
**"Degraded site response? Fix that—clear info is critical for public updates. Stay safe out there, search teams."**